Development of a SARS-COV-2 monoclonal antibody panel and its applicability as a reagent in high-throughput fluorescence reduction neutralization and immunohistochemistry assays
Mattoso, G.; Cataneo, A.; Raboni, S. M.; Nogueira, M. B.; Vaz de Paula, C.; Almeida, A. C.; Rogerio, V.; Zanchin, N.; de Noronha, L.; Zanluca, C.; Duarte dos Santos, C. N.
Show abstract
Since its emergence in late 2019, infection by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 disease) has quickly spread worldwide, leading to a pandemic that has caused millions of deaths and huge socio-economic losses. Although vaccination against COVID-19 has significantly reduced disease mortality, it has been shown that protection wanes over time, and that circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants may escape vaccine-derived immunity. Therefore, serological studies are still necessary to assess protection in the population and better guide vaccine booster programs. A common measure of protective immunity is the presence of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). However, the gold standard method for measuring nAbs (plaque reduction neutralization test, or PRNT) is laborious and time-consuming, limiting its large-scale applicability. In this study, we developed a high-throughput fluorescence reduction neutralization assay (FRNA) to detect SARS-CoV-2 nAbs. Because the assay relies on immunostaining, we also developed and characterized in-house monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to lower assay costs and reduce the vulnerability of the test to reagent shortages. Using samples collected before the pandemic and from individuals vaccinated against COVID-19, we showed that the results of the FRNA we developed using commercial and in-house mAbs strongly correlated with those of the standard PRNT method while providing results in 70% less time. In addition to providing a fast, reliable, and high-throughput alternative for measuring nAbs, the FRNA can be easily customized to assess other SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs).
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A cellular assay for spike/ACE2 fusion: quantification of fusion-inhibitory antibodies after COVID-19 and vaccination 95%
- Scalable, Micro-Neutralization Assay for Qualitative Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in Human Clinical Samples 95%
- Function is more reliable than quantity to follow up the humoral response to the Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein after natural infection or COVID-19 vaccination 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by using a commercial surrogate virus neutralization ELISA: can it substitute the classical neutralization test? 97%
- Calibration of Two Validated SARS-CoV-2 Pseudovirus Neutralization Assays for COVID-19 Vaccine Evaluation 95%
- Reduced serum neutralization capacity against SARS-CoV-2 variants in a multiplex ACE2 RBD competition assay 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional and quantitative evaluation of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immunity 96%
- Choosing the right tool for the job: A comprehensive assessment of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 as surrogates for authentic virus neutralization 95%
- The comparability of Anti-Spike SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests is time-dependent: a prospective observational study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surrogate virus neutralisation test based on nanoluciferase-tagged antigens to quantify inhibitory antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and characterise Omicron-specific reactivity 97%
- Validation of a novel fluorescent lateral flow assay for rapid qualitative and quantitative assessment of total anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD binding antibody units (BAU) from plasma or fingerstick whole-blood of COVID-19 vaccinees 95%
- Mice immunized with the vaccine candidate HexaPro spike produce neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.