Student perceptions of cardiovascular physiology module format in a preclinical medical science course
Scherrer, K.; Sullivan, S.; Dallaghan, G. B.; Moorefield, E.
Show abstract
Positive active learning outcomes require student engagement with foundational, preparatory material prior to class. The current study involved thorough updating of cardiovascular physiology module format. It then examined preclinical medical student perceptions, and midterm exam performance, after using different preparatory module formats that were reviewed prior to participating in interactive classroom sessions. Modules that were initially created in Articulate Storyline were updated in Articulate Rise360 and introduced over a 3-year period. Both module styles contained the same cardiovascular physiology content, but updated Rise360 modules presented content in multiple formats to capture a variety of student learning preferences and divided each concept into several smaller topics to maintain student attention. Although midterm exam performance remained unchanged, student evaluations revealed that the updated Rise360 modules were more helpful with fewer technical issues indicating that students preferred the interactive online modules to prepare for collaborative classroom exercises. Students find updated preparatory modules to be more helpful and may therefore be more likely to engage with them before class and ultimately lead to a more productive interactive classroom learning experience.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Training Doctoral Students in Critical Thinking and Experimental Design using Problem-based Learning 96%
- Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Instruction for Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Physician Associate Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study 95%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 96%
- High School Science Fair: What Students Say -- Mastery, Performance, and Self-Determination Theory 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 92%
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 91%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 95%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 88%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Handling and Packaging of Medical Bags at the Acute Disaster Site Under High Temperature Conditions 87%
- The Aliment to Bodily Condition knowledgebase (ABCkb): A database connecting plants and human health 85%
- Occupational safety and health aspects of corporate social responsibility reporting in Japan: comparison between 2012 and 2020 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.