Intentions and Willingness to receive Covid-19 vaccine among teaching and non-teaching staff in selected higher institutions of learning in Kampala and Wakiso districts, Central -Uganda
Lulu, P. M.; Atim, F.; Kareodu, R.; Wakula, F. L.; Okiria, J. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 was first discovered by WHO, 2019 in Wuhan, later spread to different parts of the world with thousands of deaths. COVID-19 vaccine was very important in reducing severity of the infection. Willingness to be vaccinated considerably varied according to regions. We assessed factors influencing intentions and willingness to receive covid-19 vaccines among teaching and non-teaching staff in higher institutions of learning. MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional study design was adopted employing quantitative data collection and analysis approaches. Data was collected electronically using different online sources including emails, social media, popular media platforms and websites. 363 sample determined using Kish & Leslie (1965) of simple random sampling for single proportions. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis done using SPP (23.0). Results130(35.8%) intentions and willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine. Influencing factors were; age between 30-39 (aOR=15491.54,95% CI=359-667551.9, P=0.000**, 40-49 (aOR=931, 95% CI=25.6-33816.4, p=0.000**), gender (aOR=4.66, 95% CI=2.06-1056, p=0.000*), staff category (aOR=7.71, 95% CI=4.34-14.71,p=0.000**), ownership (aOR=0.08, 95% CI=0.032-0.206, p=0.000**), being under health insurance (aOR=200.62, 95% CI=29.6-1359.18, p=0.000*, residency (aOR=19.88, 95% CI=4.63-85.26, p=0.000*), knowing where to get the vaccine (aOR=121.15, 95% CI=161.1-910.3, p=0.000**), COVID-19 vaccine important for prevention of the infection (aOR=19.73, 95% CI=2.27-171.52, p=0.007*), minor side effects of COVID-19 vaccines manageable (aOR=002, 95% CI= 0.00-0.15, p=0.000**), take painkillers if developed side effects (aOR=8.67, 95% CI=4.87-15.43, p=0.000*), responsibility to protect others by getting vaccinated (aOR=0.36, 95% CI=0.21-0.62, p=0.000**), concerned about getting infected with COVID-19 from the vaccine (aOR=0.002, 95% CI=0.00-0.03, p=0.000*). ConclusionIntentions and willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine was low. This was attributed to age, gender, staff category, ownership, knowledge, attitude, where to get the vaccine, trust, vaccine efficacy, concern about getting infected after receiving the vaccine. MoH/MoE&S and development partners should emphasize improving attitude and knowledge of teaching and non-teaching staff in higher institutions to increase willingness.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 99%
- Psychological antecedents towards COVID-19 vaccination using the Arabic 5C validated tool: An online study in 13 Arab countries 98%
- Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in Pakistan Among Health Care Workers 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 98%
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 97%
- Improving the last mile delivery of vaccines through an informed push model: experiences, opportunities and costs based on an implementation study in a rural district in Uganda 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 98%
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 97%
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: healthcare workers’ perceptions and beliefs of vaccine effectiveness and advocacy: a national survey during the first week of the World Health Organization variant alert 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.