Back

Prescribing pre- and post-operative physical activity interventions for people undergoing breast cancer surgery: a qualitative systematic review.

Howe, L.; Husband, A.; Robinson-Barella, A.

2023-05-21 surgery
10.1101/2023.05.16.23290041 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionUndertaking physical activity, pre- and post-operatively, can benefit recovery time and improve post-surgical outcomes. One cohort of patients that have reported these benefits are those undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Yet, what remains unclear is the level to which physical activity interventions are implemented into standard surgical care for patients with breast cancer. AimsThis systematic review aimed to examine existing qualitative evidence focusing on pre- and post-operative physical activity interventions to better understand the benefits and shortcomings of physical activity within the surgical journey. MethodsA systematic literature search was undertaken in November 2022, across five databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus. Qualitative studies involving people with breast cancer who had undertaken a physical activity intervention, either pre- and/or post-operatively, were included for analysis. The review was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42022372466 and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative study checklist was used to assess study quality. ResultsFourteen studies were included, comprising the perspectives of 418 people receiving surgery for breast cancer. One study implemented pre-operative physical activity interventions; the remaining studies focused on post-operative interventions. A narrative systematic review was undertaken due to heterogeneity in reported results. Four themes were developed by thematic analysis, centring on: (i) factors promoting engagement with physical activity interventions; (ii) factors preventing engagement with physical activity interventions; (iii) the impact of pre- and post-operative interventions on physical and psychological health; and (iii) participant recommendations for pre- and post-operative interventions. Conclusionpre- and post-operative physical activity interventions were well-accepted. Patients recognised factors which promoted or prevented engagement with interventions, as well as pre- and post-operative physical and psychological benefits that arose as a result. Evidence based co-design studies may further inform successful implementation of physical activity into standard care for surgical breast cancer patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
24.5%
2
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.4%
3
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.8%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
10
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
12
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
13
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
16
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
20
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%