Predictors of Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A One-Year Case-Control Study
Camacho-Dominguez, L.; Rojas, M.; Herran, M.; Rodriguez, Y.; Beltran, S.; Saboya Galindo, P.; Aguirre-Correal, N.; Espitia, M.; Garcia, S.; Bejarano, V.; Morales-Gonzalez, V.; Covaleda-Vargas, J. E.; Rodriguez-Jimenez, M.; Zapata, E.; Monsalve, D. M.; Acosta-Ampudia, Y.; Anaya, J.-M.; Ramirez-Santana, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the associated factors with mortality, in addition to age and sex, in a high-complexity hospital in Bogota, Colombia, during the first year of the pandemic. DesignA case-control study. SettingHigh-complexity center above 2,640 meters above sea level (masl) in Colombia. MethodsA case-control study was conducted on 564 patients admitted to the hospital with confirmed COVID-19. Deceased patients (n: 282) and a control group (n: 282), matched by age, sex, and month of admission, were included. Clinical and paraclinical variables were retrospectively obtained by systematic revision of clinical records. Multiple imputations by chained equation (MICE) were implemented to account for missing variables. Classification and regression trees (CART) were estimated to evaluate the interaction of associated factors on admission and their role in predicting mortality during hospitalization. ResultsMost of the patients included were males in the seventh decade of life. Most of the admissions occurred between July and August 2021. Surprisingly, recovered patients reported heterogeneous symptomatology, whereas deceased patients were most likely to present respiratory distress, dyspnea, and seizures on admission. In addition, the latter group exhibited a higher burden of comorbidities and alterations in laboratory parameters. After the imputation of datasets, CART analysis estimated 14 clinical profiles based on respiratory distress, LDH, dyspnea, hemoglobin, D-dimer, ferritin, blood urea nitrogen, C-reactive protein, PaO2/FiO2, dysgeusia, total bilirubin, platelets, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The accuracy model for prediction was 85.6% (P < 0.0001). ConclusionMultivariate analysis yielded a reliable model to predict mortality in COVID-19. This analysis revealed new interactions between clinical and paraclinical features in addition to age and sex. Furthermore, this predictive model could offer new clues for the personalized management of this condition in clinical settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of the Gamma variant on COVID-19 Patient admissions in a Southern Brazilian tertiary hospital - A comparison of dual pandemic phases 97%
- Risk factors associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A prospective, longitudinal, unicenter study in Reus, Spain 97%
- First and second waves of coronavirus disease-19: A comparative study in hospitalized patients in Reus, Spain 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of Developing Symptomatic Disease in Ethiopian COVID-19 Patients 95%
- Evaluation of the disease outcome in Covid-19 infected patients by disease symptoms: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Ilam Province, Iran 95%
- Biometric covariates and outcome in COVID-19 patients: Are we looking close enough? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 97%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 95%
- Is the infection of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant associated with the outcomes of COVID-19 patients? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relative expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in COVID-19 patients manifested disease severities 96%
- Risk factors for bacterial infections in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A case control study 94%
- The antibody response to the glycan α-Gal correlates with COVID-19 disease symptoms 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.