The efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced and metastatic thyroid cancer: Study Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of Phase III and IV randomised controlled trials
Bindra, J.; Vlok, R.; Gild, M.
Show abstract
Background and AimsTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now readily considered in the management of advanced and metastatic thyroid cancer. However, a key limiting factor are their adverse events (AEs), which can impair quality of life and influence patient acceptance of treatment. Prior systematic reviews have assessed the efficacy and safety of TKIs by reviewing both retrospective and prospective studies and further Phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have since been published. We therefore plan to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of only prospective phase III and IV RCTs including the most recently published trials to investigate the efficacy and AEs of TKIs in patients with advanced and metastatic thyroid cancer compared to placebo. Review methodsThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, Embase and PubMed databases will be electronically searched. Grey literature will be searched through Clinicaltrials.gov and www.ISRCTN.com. Expert informants will be contacted. We will include Phase III and IV randomised controlled trials that investigate the efficacy and AEs of TKIs in adults with advanced or metastatic thyroid cancer compared to placebo. Two authors will extract and assess for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Data extraction will include outcomes for objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and AEs, including diarrhoea, nausea, hypertension, proteinuria, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (PPE) and grade 3+ AEs, with a subgroup analysis on medullary vs differentiated thyroid cancer, TKI type and history of prior TKI or other systemic therapy. Pooled effect sizes will be meta-analysed using Review Manager 5 software through a random effects model. The study will be reported in line with the PRISMA guidelines. DiscussionThis will be the first systematic review to be conducted on the safety and efficacy of TKIs in advanced or metastatic thyroid cancer to meta-analyse phase III and IV RCT level data and include the most recently published trials. This review aims to highlight the balance between the therapeutic effect and toxicity of TKIs, and guide future studies that may be required in exploring different dosing and timing of TKI therapy.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic disorders and the risk of head and neck cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 90%
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive value of preclinical models for CAR-T cell therapy clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis 84%
- Efficacy of PD-(L)1 blockade monotherapy compared to PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy in first-line PD-L1-positive advanced lung adenocarcinomas: A cohort study 83%
- Long-term mortality outcomes among immunotherapy recipients treated with dupilumab for the management of cutaneous immune-related adverse events 83%
Similar papers in this journal
- Postmarketing commitments for novel drugs and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: a cross-sectional analysis 88%
- Neutrophil counts and cancer prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies 88%
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of lag time to cancer diagnosis and treatment on clinical outcomes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 89%
- Evaluation of ID NOW and RT-PCR for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an Ambulatory Population 88%
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The TARCiS statement: Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching 89%
- Prophylaxis for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis 88%
- Myocarditis and Pericarditis following COVID-19 Vaccination: Rapid Systematic Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Course 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.