The burden of dengue and risk factors of transmission in nine districts in Sri Lanka
Jeewandara, C.; Karunananda, M.; Fernando, S.; Danasekara, S.; Jayakody, G.; Arulkumaran, S.; Samaraweera, N. Y.; Kumarawansha, S.; Sivaganesh, S.; Amarasinghe, P. G.; Jayasinghe, C.; Wijesekara, D.; Marasinghe, M. B.; Mambulage, U.; Wijayatilake, H.; Seneviratne, K.; Bandara, A. D. P.; Gallage, C. P.; Colambage, N. R.; Udayasiri, A. A. T.; Lokumarambage, T.; Upasena, Y.; Weerasooriya, W. P. K. P.; group, S. s.; Ogg, G.; Malavige, G. N.
Show abstract
BackgroundIt is crucial to understand the differences in dengue seroprevalence rates in different regions in Sri Lanka to understand the burden of infection to plan dengue vaccination programmes. Methodsage stratified seroprevalence rates were assessed in 5208 children, aged 10 to 19 years, in nine districts representing the nine provinces in Sri Lanka. A stratified multi-stage cluster was used to select 146 schools representing each district. Probability proportionate to the size (PPS) sampling technique based on the age distribution of general population and the urbanicity in each district was used to select the number of clusters to be enrolled for the study from each district. FindingsThe overall dengue seroprevalence rates in children was 24.8%, with the highest rates reported from Trincomalee (54.3%) and the lowest rates from Badulla (14.2%), which is a high altitude estate area. There was a weak but positive correlation between the dengue antibody positivity rates and age in districts which had seroprevalence rates of >25%, while there was no increase in antibody titres with age in the other districts. While the seroprevalence rates was significantly higher in urban areas (35.8%) compared to rural (23.2%) and estate areas (9.4%), there was no association with seropositivity rates with population density (Spearmans r=-0.01, p=0.98), in each district. InterpretationThe seroprevalence rates in many districts were <25% and the rates were very different to those reported from Colombo. Therefore, it would be important to take into account these differences when rolling out dengue vaccines in Sri Lanka. FundingWe are grateful to the World Health Organization and the UK Medical Research Council for support.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial Patterns of Dengue Incidence in Nepal During Record Outbreaks in 2022 and 2023: Implications for Public Health Interventions 96%
- Did COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccines influence the patterns of Dengue in 2021: An exploratory analysis of two observational studies from North India 95%
- Field efficacy of guppies and pyriproxyfen (Sumilarv(R) 2MR) combined with community engagement on dengue vectors in Cambodia: a randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic investigation of a dengue virus outbreak in Thiès, Senegal, in 2018 95%
- Malaria parasite density and detailed qualitative microscopy enhances large-scale profiling of infection endemicity in Nigeria 93%
- Microbial Metagenomic Approach Uncovers the First Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease Virus genome in Sub-Saharan Africa 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological and virological factors determining dengue transmission in Sri Lanka during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Genomic sequencing and neutralizing serological profiles during acute dengue infection: A 2017 cohort study in Nepal 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in three Kenyan Health and Demographic Surveillance Sites, December 2020-May 2021 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Wood equation allows consistent fitting of individual antibody responses profiles in Zika virus or SARS-CoV-2 infected patients 91%
- Genomics-based timely detection of Dengue Virus type I genotypes I and V in Uruguay 90%
- Comparative study of immunogenicity and safety of Gam-COVID-Vac and Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV vaccines in Belarus 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.