Back

Impact of active physiotherapy on physical activity level in stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

GONCALVES, S.; LE BOURVELLEC, M.; MANDIGOUT, S.; Duclos, N. C.

2023-04-24 neurology
10.1101/2023.04.21.23288899 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStroke survivors are primarily physically inactive. Physiotherapy practice might represent professional support to improve this alarming lifestyle. However, evidence is scarce regarding the effectiveness of active physiotherapy on physical activity level in stroke survivors. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Participants: Stroke survivors living in the community. Intervention: Any active physiotherapy, i.e., involving exercises that require voluntary effort by the patient. Outcome measure: Physical activity level. ResultsOut of 5590 identified references, 25 RCTs were eligible, and 21 had available data. Pooling resulted in a small significant effect size in favor of active physiotherapy (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.40, heterogeneity I2=65%), and medium significant effect when physical activity level was measured using an objective tool (SMD 0.48, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92, I2=73%). In addition, meta-regression showed that 35% of the variance in trial outcome was explained by the measurement tool (objective or subjective) and 23% by age. Finally, none of the variances were associated with specific dosage in frequency, time, or exercise duration, nor with the severity of the disability. ConclusionActive physiotherapy seems effective in increasing objective physical activity among stroke survivors living in the community. However, the evidence supporting the efficacy of active physiotherapy was found to be of low certainty. Thus, further evidence is required. Registration PROPEROCRD42022315639.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
3
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
8
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
10
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
12
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%