Assessing Willingness to receive COVID-19 Vaccines, associated factors and reasons for hesitancy among persons aged 13-80 years in Central Uganda. A population-based surveillance Cohort.
DAAMA, A.; Naziru, R.; Kasango, A.; Kigozi Nalwoga, G.; Nalugoda, F.; Bulamba, R.; Kyasanku, E.; Nakigozi, G.; Kigozi, G.; Kagaayi, J.; Mugamba, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundVaccination is essential for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. However adequate vaccine coverage is a critical to the effectiveness of the vaccine at a population level. Data on to acceptability of the vaccine in Urban areas are limited. This study examined the prevalence, factors associated with willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine and reasons for hesitancy in the predominantly urban in central Uganda (Wakiso) MethodsData were obtained from a cross-sectional study conducted from March 1st, 2021, to September 30th, 2021 in the urban population-based cohort of the Africa Medical and behavioral Sciences Organization (AMBSO). Multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals of willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. ResultsA total of 1,903 participants were enrolled in the study; 61% of whom were females. About 63% of participants indicated willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Younger age groups (13-19 and 20-29) were less likely to accept the vaccine compared to the persons ages 40-49 years (aPR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.84 for the 13-19 years and 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.98 for age group 20-29, compared to those ages 40-49 years. Post-primary education (aPR=1.05; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.09 compared to primary level), being a students and government staff (APR=1.13; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.23 compared to construction and Mechanic workers) were associated with willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine. Some of the reported reasons for hesitancy included; concerns about side effects 154(57.0%), about 64(23.7%) did not think the vaccines were effective, and those who did not like the vaccines 32(11.9%). ConclusionA substantial proportion of individuals were not willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. More effort is needed to reduce vaccine hesitancy, especially among the young and people with lower formal education.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 98%
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 97%
- Assessments of Effectiveness of Technologies Utilizations in VIHSCM Among Selected Health Facilities in Tanzania Mainland 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 98%
- Age-appropriate Vaccination and Associated Factors among Children Aged 12- 35 Months in Ethiopia: A Multi-Level Analysis 98%
- Psychological antecedents towards COVID-19 vaccination using the Arabic 5C validated tool: An online study in 13 Arab countries 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Awareness, Acceptance and Associated Factors of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among Parents of Daughters in Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study 97%
- Assessing the level and determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in Kenya 97%
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare staff and students of a tertiary institution in South Africa 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 96%
- Vaccine confidence and timeliness of childhood immunisation by health information source, maternal, socioeconomic, and geographic characteristics in Albania 96%
- Maternal Factors Promoting Normal Linear Growth of Children from Impoverished Rwandan Households 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.