Performance of ChatGPT on Clinical Medicine Entrance Examination for Chinese Postgraduate in Chinese
Liu, X.; Fang, C.; Wang, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe ChatGPT, a Large-scale language models-based Artificial intelligence (AI), has fueled interest in medical care. However, the ability of AI to understand and generate text is constrained by the quality and quantity of training data available for that language. This study aims to provide qualitative feedback on ChatGPTs problem-solving capabilities in medical education and clinical decisionmaking in Chinese. MethodsA dataset of Clinical Medicine Entrance Examination for Chinese Postgraduate was used to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT3.5 in medical knowledge in Chinese language. The indictor of accuracy, concordance (explaining affirms the answer) and frequency of insights was used to assess performance of ChatGPT in original and encoding medical questions. ResultAccording to our evaluation, ChatGPT received a score of 153.5/300 for original questions in Chinese, which is slightly above the passing threshold of 129/300. Additionally, ChatGPT showed low accuracy in answering open-ended medical questions, with total accuracy of 31.5%. While ChatGPT demonstrated a commendable level of concordance (achieving 90% concordance across all questions) and generated innovative insights for most problems (at least one significant insight for 80% of all questions). ConclusionChatGPTs performance was suboptimal for medical education and clinical decision-making in Chinese compared with in English. However, ChatGPT demonstrated high internal concordance and generated multiple insights in Chinese language. Further research should investigate language-based differences in ChatGPTs healthcare performance.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT on Chinese National Medical Licensing Examinations: A Five-Year Examination Evaluation Study for Physicians, Pharmacists and Nurses 98%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 96%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of Generative Pretrained Transformer on the National Medical Licensing Examination in Japan 98%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 96%
- Cardiology Knowledge Assessment of Retrieval-Augmented Open versus Proprietary Large Language Models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A typology of physician input approaches to using AI chatbots for clinical decision-making: a mixed methods study 93%
- Utilization of Generative AI-drafted Responses for Managing Patient-Provider Communication 92%
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Analysis of Multimodal Large Language Models GPT-4o and o1 vs Clinicians in Clinical Case Challenge Questions 93%
- The PBL teaching method in Neurology Education in the Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduate students: An Observational Study 91%
- Open Science Practices Among Authors Published in Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An International, Cross-Sectional Survey 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.