Public engagement with biomedical science: An analysis of Black, Hispanic, and General Population adults in the United States
Abeles, A. T.; Hari, K.; Manento, C.; Block, K.; Musch, S.; Schuldt, J. P.; Simoncelli, T.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to better understand public engagement with biomedical science across groups-especially those that have been historically marginalized by the medical science community. However, common approaches to studying group differences in science attitudes are often limited by small sample sizes or by categorizing individuals based on demographic variables, which may obscure meaningful variability within a given population. We recruited three probability-based samples of Black (N = 963), General Population (N = 957), and Hispanic (N = 964) adults living in the U.S. (October 21 - November 5, 2021). Employing a novel application of a non-negative matrix factorization model to conduct an attitudinal-based segmentation that categorized individuals based on distinct orientations toward biomedical science, our analysis revealed 10 unique mindsets across the three surveyed populations. Overall, our work underscores the value of recruiting independent samples from underserved and marginalized communities by revealing underexplored variation in how different publics orient toward biomedical science. TeaserUsing a values-based segmentation approach, we uncover 10 unique biomedical mindsets in the general, Black, and Hispanic adult populations in the U.S.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Who is (Not) Complying with the Social Distancing Directive and Why? Testing a General Framework of Compliance with Multiple Measures of Social Distancing 95%
- Factors Influencing Precision Medicine Knowledge and Attitudes 94%
- Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers' opinions on success indicators 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Black women in medical education publishing: Bibliometric and testimonio accounts using intersectionality methodology 92%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 91%
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.