Cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in older adults: a combined protocol for an individual participant data analysis for risk prediction and a network meta-analysis of novel anti-diabetic drugs
Aponte Ribero, V.; Alwan, H.; Efthimiou, O.; Abolhassani, N.; Bauer, D. C.; Henrard, S.; Christiaens, A.; Waeber, G.; Rodondi, N.; Gencer, B.; Del Giovane, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionOlder and multimorbid adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Estimating risk and preventing CVD is a challenge in this population notably because it is underrepresented in clinical trials. Our study aims to (1) assess if T2D and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with the risk of CVD events and mortality in older adults, (2) develop a risk score for CVD events and mortality for older adults with T2D, (3) evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of novel antidiabetics. Methods and analysisFor Aim 1, we will analyse individual participant data on individuals aged [≥]65 years from five cohort studies: the Optimising Therapy to Prevent Avoidable Hospital Admissions in Multimorbid Older People study; the Cohorte Lausannoise study; the Health, Aging and Body Composition study; the Health and Retirement Study; and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. We will fit flexible parametric survival models (FPSM) to assess the association of T2D and HbA1c with CVD events and mortality. For Aim 2, we will use data on individuals aged [≥]65 years with T2D from the same cohorts to develop risk prediction models for CVD events and mortality using FPSM. We will assess model performance, perform internal-external cross validation, and derive a point-based risk score. For Aim 3, we will systematically search randomized controlled trials of novel antidiabetics. Network meta-analysis will be used to determine comparative efficacy in terms of CVD, CKD, and retinopathy outcomes, and safety of these drugs. Confidence in results will be judged using the CINeMA tool. Ethics and disseminationAims 1 and 2 were approved by the local ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern); no approval is required for Aim 3. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented in scientific conferences. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONSO_LIWe will analyse individual participant data from multiple cohort studies of older adults who are often not well represented in large clinical trials. C_LIO_LIBy using flexible survival parametric models, we will be able to capture the potentially complex shapes of the baseline hazard functions of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. C_LIO_LIOur network meta-analysis will include recently published randomised controlled trials on novel anti-diabetic drugs that have not been included in previous network meta-analysis and results will be stratified by age and baseline HbA1c C_LIO_LIAlthough we plan to use several international cohorts, the external validity of our findings and particularly of our prediction model will need to be assessed in independent studies C_LIO_LIOur study will help guide CVD risk estimation and prevention among older adults with type 2 diabetes C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 94%
- RESEARCH PROTOCOL: Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus 94%
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Clinical outcomes due to COVID-19. Protocol of a systematic literature review 92%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 92%
- The impact of outdoor walking interventions on frailty among older adults with mobility limitations: findings from the Getting Older Adults Outdoors (GO-OUT) study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 93%
- Effectiveness of integrated care for older adults with depression and hypertension in rural China: a cluster randomized controlled trial 91%
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lifestyles and their relative contribution to biological aging across multiple organ systems: change analysis from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort Study 91%
- Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics with machine learning for predicting progression from prediabetes to diabetes 90%
- A Mendelian randomization study of the role of lipoprotein subfractions in coronary artery disease 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 90%
- Predictive value of circulating NMR metabolic biomarkers for type 2 diabetes risk in the UK Biobank study 90%
- Association of heavy menstrual bleeding with cardiovascular diseases in US female hospitalizations 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.