Bibliometric analysis on cannibalism/infanticide and maternal aggression towards pups in laboratory animals

Animal welfare has evolved during the past decades to improve not only the quality of life of laboratory animals but also the quality and reproducibility of scientific investigations. Bibliometric analysis has become an important tool to complete the current knowledge with academic databases. Our objective was to investigate whether scientific research on cannibalism/infanticide is connected with maternal aggression towards the offspring in laboratory animals. To carry out our research, we performed a specific search for published articles on each concept. Results were analyzed in the opensource environment RStudio with the package Bibliometrix. We obtained 228 and 134 articles for the first search (cannibalism/infanticide) and the second search (maternal aggression towards the pups) respectively. We observed that the interest in infanticide cannibalism started in the 1950s, while researchers started showing interest in maternal aggression towards the pups 30 years later. Our analyses indicated that maternal aggression had better citations in scientific literature. In addition, although our results showed some common features (e.g., oxytocin or medial preoptic area in the brain), we observed a gap between cannibalism/infanticide and maternal aggression towards the pups with only 18 published articles in common for both the searches. Therefore, we recommend researchers to combine both concepts in further investigations in the context of cannibalism for better dissemination and higher impact in laboratory animals welfare research. Highlights- Cannibalism/Infanticide and maternal aggression have been investigated separately. - Maternal aggression has a higher impact on scientific literature. - Combining both topics may increase cannibalism/infanticide impact.