Development and Validation of an MGBP Nomogram for Functional Prognosis Prediction of Pediatric Intracerebral Hemorrhage
ZHOU, J.-h.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Chen, Y.; Ming, M.-X.; Shen, Q.-L.; Zheng, J.-C.; Pan, G.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.-M.; Lu, G.-P.
Show abstract
BackgroundPediatric intracerebral hemorrhage (pICH) remains a considerable cause of mortality. This study aimed to explore functional prognosis predictors in Chinese patients with pICH and attempted to develop and validate a nomogram for estimating individual risk probability of short-term unfavorable functional prognosis. MethodsA retrospective case-control study through records reviewing was conducted, non-neonate patients with nontraumatic pICH discharged from the Childrens Hospital of Fudan University between January 2012 and December 2021 were all originally included. The primary outcome was unfavorable functional prognosis at 3 months post pICH defined as a score of 3-6 as measured using the modified Rankin Scale (ranging from 0 [asymptomatic] to 6 [death]). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to screen prognosis predictors, a prediction model-based nomogram was developed. Internal validation was assessed and quantified as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and bootstrapped calibration curve. ResultsA total of 269 pICH patients were enrolled, the median age was 57.2 months (interquartile range, 5.4-115.1), and 157 (58.4%) patients were male. The median follow-up time was 3.2 months (interquartile range, 2.8-3.6), 112 (41.6%) patients had unfavorable functional outcome. Cerebral vascular malformation as etiology, modified Glasgow Coma Score on admission, brainstem location, and intracerebral hemorrhage volume as percentage of total brain volume were identified as functional prognosis predictors. A nomogram was established comprising these four predictors, abbreviated to MGBP, the area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.827 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.778-0.877) with good calibration (P=0.803 for the Spiegelhalters Z-test). ConclusionsThe MGBP nomogram is the first model developed and validated in a consecutive cohort to predict 3-month unfavorable functional prognosis post nontraumatic pICH in Chinese children, which may provide clinicians with a potentially effective approach for early prediction and timely management of pICH.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 94%
- Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy Severity Score Validation and Temporal Dynamics in Korean Pediatric Stroke 94%
- Low hemoglobin causes hematoma expansion and poor intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decreased door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the early COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea – an observational study 90%
- Combination therapy of Tocilizumab and steroid for management of COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience from Pune, Western India 90%
- Computed Tomography Features of COVID-19 in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 96%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 95%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computed tomography perfusion parameters predictive of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion 96%
- Recovery of intrinsic cognitive weakness in successive processing after bypass surgery for pediatric moyamoya disease 95%
- Aneurysmal versus “Benign” Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.