Back

Administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Strain BB-12 (R) in Healthy Children: Characterization, Functional Composition, and Metabolism of the Gut Microbiome

Vizioli, C.; Jaime-Lara, R. B.; Daniel, S. G.; Franks, A.; Diallo, A. F.; Bittinger, K.; Tan, T. P.; Merenstein, D. J.; Brooks, B.; Joseph, P. V.; Maki, K.

2023-02-06 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.02.02.23285145 medRxiv
Show abstract

The consumption of probiotics may influence childrens gut microbiome and metabolome, which may reflect shifts in gut microbial diversity composition and metabolism. These potential changes might have a beneficial impact on health. However, there is a lack of evidence investigating the effect of probiotics on the gut microbiome and metabolome of children. We aimed to examine the potential impact of a two (Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii; S2) vs. three (S2 + Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strain BB-12) strain-supplemented yogurt. Included in this study were 59 participants, aged one to five years old, recruited to phase I of a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Fecal samples were collected at baseline, after the intervention, and at twenty days post-intervention discontinuation, and untargeted metabolomics and shotgun metagenomics were performed. Shotgun metagenomics and metabolomic analyses showed no global changes in either intervention groups gut microbiome alpha or beta diversity indices. The relative abundance of the two and three intervention bacteria increased in the S2 and S2 + BB12 groups, respectively, from Day 0 to Day 10. In the S2+BB12 group, the abundance of several fecal metabolites was reduced at Day 10, including alanine, glycine, lysine, phenylalanine, serine, and valine. These fecal metabolite changes did not occur in the S2 group. Future research using longer probiotic intervention durations and in children at risk for gastrointestinal disorders may elucidate if functional metabolite changes confer a protective gastrointestinal effect.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.1%
3
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
9
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
21
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
23
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%