Back

A quasi-experimental study to compare effectiveness of a breastfeeding arm sling with normal breastfeeding cross-cradle hold position

Disorntatiwat, P.; Steen, M.; Liblub, S.

2023-01-25 nutrition
10.1101/2023.01.24.23284943 medRxiv
Show abstract

Breastfeeding has many benefits for the newborn and mother therefore, the World Health Organization guidelines recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months, with continued breastfeeding for up to two years. However, exclusive breastfeeding rates in the first 6 months in Thailand were reported to be approximately, 14% in 2019. Research has highlighted that many mothers have a lack of belief in their ability to breastfeed, and some physical conditions, such as tiredness and difficulty continually holding their baby in a comfortable position. Additionally, first-time breastfeeding can contribute to mothers having difficulties breastfeeding during the early postnatal period. Therefore, the Arm sling innovation (device) has been designed to provide support and comfort whilst holding the newborn. This study compared the effectiveness of the breastfeeding arm sling innovation to support breastfeeding in cross-cradle hold position and normal cross-cradle hold position breastfeeding in first-time mothers. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest research design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of breastfeeding before and after the intervention among first-time mothers in the postnatal unit, at Ramathibodi hospital, Thailand. A total of 46 postpartum mothers participated in the study. The results showed that the effectiveness of breastfeeding reported by mothers between using a normal cross-cradle hold position and using breastfeeding arm sling innovation was statistically significantly different (t = 4.32, P < 0.001) with helping to hold the baby securely without slipping (t=5.68, p<0.001) and mothers can continue to breastfeed (t=2.09, p <0.001). Majority of mothers were satisfied with the support of using the breastfeeding arm sling innovation design. The breastfeeding arm sling innovation contributes to the effectiveness of breastfeeding by assisting and supporting the mother and babys position to breastfeed more comfortably, thus assisting first-time mothers to feel comfortable, confident, and able to continue breastfeeding.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.1%
2
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
4
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
8
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
28
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
30
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%