Back

High proportion of Ugandans with pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses

Namuniina, A.; Muyanja, E. S.; Biribawa, V. M.; Okech, B. A.; Ssemaganda, A.; Price, M. A.; Hills, N.; Nanteza, A.; Bagaya, B. S.; Weiskopf, D.; Riou, C.; Reynolds, S. J.; Galwango, R. M.; Redd, A. D.

2023-01-20 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.01.16.23284626 medRxiv
Show abstract

The estimated mortality rate of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic varied greatly around the world with multiple countries in East, Central, and West Africa having significantly lower rates of COVID-19 related fatalities than many resource-rich nations with significantly earlier wide-spread access to life-saving vaccines. One possible reason for this lower mortality could be the presence of pre-existing cross-reactive immunological responses in these areas of the world. To explore this hypothesis, stored peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from Ugandans collected from 2015-2017 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (n=29) and from hospitalized Ugandan COVID-19 patients (n=3) were examined using flow-cytometry for the presence of pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell populations using four T-cell epitope mega pools. Of pre-pandemic participants, 89.7% (26/29) had either CD4+ or CD8+, or both, SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses. Specifically, CD4+ T-cell reactivity (72.4%) and CD8+ T-cell reactivity (65.5%) were relatively similar, and 13 participants (44.8%) had both types of cross-reactive types of T-cells present. There were no significant differences in response by sex in the population. The rates of cross-reactive T-cell populations in these Ugandans is higher than previous estimates from resource-rich countries like the United States (20-50% reactivity). It is unclear what role, if any, this cross-reactivity played in decreasing COVID-19 related mortality in Uganda and other African countries, but does suggest that a better understanding of global pre-existing immunological cross-reactivity could be an informative data of epidemiological intelligence moving forward.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.9%
6
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%