Blood cell differential count discretization methods to predict survival in acutely ill adults reporting to the emergency room: a retrospective cohort study in 2020
Fumagalli, R. M.; Chiarelli, M. E.; Cazzaniga, M.; Bonato, C.; D'angelo, L.; Cavalieri d oro, L.; Cerino, M.; Terragni, S.; Lainu, E.; Lorini, C.; Scarazzati, C.; Tazzari, S. E.; Porro, F.; Alde, S.; Burati, M.; Brambilla, W.; Nattino, S.; Locatelli, M.; Valsecchi, D.; Spreafico, P.; Tantardini, V.; Schiavo, G.; Zago, M. P.; Fumagalli, L. A. M.
Show abstract
AimsTo assess survival predictivity of baseline blood cell differential count (BCDC) discretization methods in acutely ill adults visiting the emergency room over one-year. MethodsRetrospective cohort study on one-year survival of adults reporting to the emergency room of the A. Manzoni Hospital (Italy) during 2020. Automated BCDC analysis performed at baseline, assessed hemoglobin, red cell mean volume and distribution width (RDW), platelet distribution width (PDW), platelet-hematocrit, absolute red blood cells, white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets. Discretization cutoffs were defined by: Benchmark laboratory reference values and Tailored (maximally selected rank statistics for linear and sigmoid-shaped distributed variables; optimal-equal hazard ratio (HR) method for U-shaped distributed variables. Explanatory variables (age, gender, inward admission) were analyzed using Cox multivariable regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves used the sum of Cox-significant variables in each method. ResultsOf 11052 patients (median age 67 years, interquartile range (IQR) 51-81, 48% female), 59% (n=6489) were discharged and 41% (n=4563) were admitted. After a 306-day median follow up (IQR 208-417 days), 9455 (86%) patients were alive and 1597 (14%) deceased. Increased HRs were associated with age > 73 years (HR=4.29 CI 3.78-4.87), and hospital admission (HR=2.05, CI 1.83-2.29). Age, sex, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, RDW, PDW, neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils were significant in overall. Benchmark included basophils and platelet count (area under the ROC curve (AUROC) 0.78). Tailored included monocyte counts and PCT (AUROC of 0.82). ConclusionsTailored discretization of BCDC provided meaningful insight regarding acute patient survival. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSInformation on survival predictivity of BCDC is scarce, particularly in acutely ill patients considering that reference values are based on the general population. What this study addsLaboratory reference interval values predicting survival were hemoglobin, RDW, MCV, neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, and basophils counts, PLT, and PDW, independently of sex, age, and acute inward admission. Survival predictivity was improved by discretization of hemoglobin, RDW, MCV, neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, and monocyte counts, and PDW, according to the maximally selected rank statistics and optimal-equal HR method. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyBaseline BCDC discretized by tailored methods may be a useful biomarker for hazard warning in acute illness.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel prognostic determinants of COVID-19-related mortality: a pilot study on severely-ill patients in Russia 96%
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 96%
- Clustering ICU patients with sepsis based on the patterns of their circulating biomarkers: a secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposing Limitations of Clinical Laboratory Tests in COVID-19 and the Promise of Immunological Biomarkers 95%
- Immune-Based Prediction of COVID-19 Severity and Chronicity Decoded Using Machine Learning 95%
- Fine analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients: toward a differential profiling of patients with severe outcome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Blood parameters measured on admission as predictors of outcome for COVID-19; a prospective UK cohort study 92%
- Post-exertion oxygen saturation as a prognostic factor for adverse outcome in patients attending the emergency department with suspected COVID-19: Observational cohort study 91%
- Emergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 96%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 95%
- Randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma therapy against standard therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of body mass index on SAPS3 prognostic performance in critically ill patients from Brazil 94%
- ChatGPT achieves comparable accuracy to specialist physicians in predicting the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy 92%
- Severe COVID-19 is characterised by inflammation and immature myeloid cells early in disease progression 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.