Back

Assessment of venous thromboembolism and use of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in CHUK, Rwanda: a cross-sectional study

Abimana, E.; NTABANGANYIMANA, E.; Ndahimana, R.; Sebatunzi R, O.; Masaisa, F.

2022-12-28 hematology
10.1101/2022.12.26.22283948
Show abstract

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is common and preventable disease among non-surgical hospitalized patients. Its incidence is high and alarming. Acute medical patients have VTE risk during and after hospitalization. Padua prediction score is a risk model created to identify high VTE risk patients among non-surgical hospitalized patients. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional survey of 107 patients admitted in Internal Medicine wards that were assessed as acute ill patients at Emergency Department, in a period of 4 weeks. The demographic and clinical data were collected using a designed questionnaire. VTE risk was defined as having a Padua Prediction score of [≥]4 points. Statistical analysis was done to determine prevalence. The patients at high VTE risk received thromboprophylaxis. ResultsOf one hundred and seven eligible patients included. 84% were found with high VTE risk. Among physiologically unstable patients, 60% of the patients were classified in red color during the time of triage, this means, they were severely sick and needing resuscitation. Among leading diagnosis, severe pneumonia was predominant (29%). Severe pneumonia and uncontrolled DM showed significant association with high VTE risk. 11.1% of high VTE risk patients were taking anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis prior to the recruitment. ConclusionThis study demonstrated a high prevalence of VTE risk among acute ill medical patients and underuse of anticoagulants thromboprophylaxis in potential patients at Kigali University Teaching Hospital, CHUK. Padua prediction score should be implemented for early detection of patients at-risk of VTE in severely ill patients and start anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis on time for reducing mortality and morbidity.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 2%
3.6× avg
2
Public Health in Practice
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
88× avg
3
British Journal of Haematology
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.3%
88× avg
4
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 4%
4.9× avg
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 110 published papers
Top 2%
6.8× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 46%
3.2%
7
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 8%
3.7× avg
8
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Wiley · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
33× avg
9
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.8%
39× avg
10
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 2%
7.2× avg
11
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.5%
34× avg
12
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 9%
2.6× avg
13
Blood
American Society of Hematology · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.6%
21× avg
14
European Journal of Neurology
Wiley · based on 20 published papers
Top 3%
11× avg
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Elsevier BV · based on 115 published papers
Top 15%
1.8× avg
16
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
17
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Elsevier BV · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
18
Diagnostics
MDPI AG · based on 36 published papers
Top 5%
3.8× avg
19
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
6.5× avg
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 26%
0.5%