Predicting Adverse Events in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Intensive Care Unit Using Machine Learning: Results and Challenges
Amal, S.; Kramer, R.; Sawyer, D.; Rabb, J. B.; Maurais, A. S.; Ross, C. S.; Iribarne, A.; Winslow, R. L.
Show abstract
It is highly important to anticipate impending problems in patients in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) and be proactive with respect to prediction of adverse events, enabling interventions to prevent them. In order to develop models that predict the occurrence of adverse events after cardiac surgery, a dataset of 9,237 patients was constructed of a single centers Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) internal database. 1,383 of those patients had developed at least one of seven defined adverse events for this analysis. For the control set, we randomly picked 1,383 patients from the group who did not develop any adverse event. The ensemble learning algorithm, random forest, was applied and outperformed the best reported logistic regression models for similar task (c-statistic of [~]0.81), by achieving an AUC of 0.86 with a 95% CI of [0.81-0.90], specificity of 0.72, sensitivity of 0.82, PPV of 0.78 and NPV of 0.77. In the future, we plan to run a similar evaluation process on a multicenter dataset, and then use this static prediction model as a context for using time-evolving data to develop algorithms for real-time feedback to care teams. In acute care settings, such as the operating room and intensive care unit, the ability to anticipate potentially fatal complications will be enhanced by using supervised machine learning algorithms.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia 93%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 93%
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 93%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 93%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 93%
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 93%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: Prospective cohort analyses of 26,270 procedures in 17,860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data 91%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.