Back

Low-dose interleukin-2 for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bader, L.; Boyman, O.; Raeber, M. E.

2022-12-04 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2022.12.02.22283038 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLow-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) shows promise as a treatment for restoring functional and numerical deficits of regulatory T (Treg) cells in patients with various autoimmune diseases. Several clinical trials testing low-dose IL-2 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been completed, with a comprehensive review of these trials currently lacking. ObjectiveWe aimed to conduct a systematic synthesis of findings from clinical trials regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of using low-dose IL-2 in patients with SLE. Furthermore, we intended to determine the sensitivity of different responder indices for IL-2-induced clinical improvement in SLE. MethodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we searched the Scopus and MEDLINE databases for articles reporting trials testing low-dose IL-2 in patients with SLE published between January 2010 and September 2022. To evaluate the risk of bias, we applied a modified version of the Downs and Black assessment tool. ResultsWe retrieved 1,018 articles, six of which we analyzed including four open-label studies and two randomized controlled trials following a detailed review process. The studies included a total of 230 patients, of which 150 received low dose IL-2 and 80 received placebo. Although the open-label studies demonstrated an expansion of Treg cells that coincided with a clinical response, the predefined primary endpoints for clinical efficacy were not achieved in the randomized controlled trials. In general, treatment with low-dose IL-2 appears to be safe and tolerated well. ConclusionLow-dose IL-2 therapy appears to be a promising strategy for treating SLE; however, larger trials are still necessary to assess clinical responses in patients with such a heterogeneous disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.