Subjective and Objective Assessment of Physical Activity in Older Adults: Results from Berlin Aging Study II
Vetter, V. M.; Oezince, D. D.; Kiselev, J.; Duezel, S.; Demuth, I.
Show abstract
Physical activity has a substantial impact on health and mortality. Besides questionnaires that rely on subjective assessment of activity levels, accelerometers can help to objectify an individuals physical activity. Physical activity was assessed with the GT3X activity monitor (ActiGraph LLC, USA) in 797 participants of the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II) and compared with questionnaire data obtained from the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA). Of all participants, 760 fulfilled the wear-time based inclusion criteria. Mean age was 75.6 years (SD: 3.8 years, range 66.0 - 94.1 years) and 53% of the included participants were female. Average wear time was 23.2 hours/day (SD 1.3 hours/day). Statistically significant differences between RAPA groups were found for all accelerometric variables except energy expenditure. Post-hoc analysis, however, suggested low agreement between subjective and objective assessment of physical activity. When focusing on the first question of the RAPA questionnaire, participants who reported to be "seldom or never active" showed statistically significant lower activity levels in Vector Magnitude, step counts, and cut-off defined moderate physical activity (p<0.05). Total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c were weakly correlated with accelerometric variables (Pearsons r [≤] 0.25). Results from this study suggest that subjectively assessed data from the RAPA and objectively assessed data from accelerometric variables obtained from the GT3X monitor are partially inconsistent in terms of the physical activity level of the participants.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Behaviour-based movement cut-off points in 3-year old children comparing wrist- with hip-worn actigraphs MW8 and GT3X 96%
- Physical determinants of daily physical activity in older men and women 96%
- Number of days required to estimate objectively measured physical activity constructs in different age groups 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age is Associated with Dampened Circadian Patterns of Rest and Activity: The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) 93%
- Associations and Interaction Effects of Socioeconomic, Lifestyle, and Genetic Factors on Intrinsic Capacity 93%
- Associations between D 3 Cr muscle mass and MR thigh muscle volume with strength, power, physical performance, fitness, and limitations in older adults in the SOMMA study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical activity levels of older adults: an analysis of the CHARIOT COVID-19 Rapid Response Study 94%
- Reference values and validation of the 1-min sit-to-stand test in healthy 5- to 16-year-old youth: a cross-sectional study 94%
- Correlates of and changes in aerobic physical activity and strength training before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK – findings from the HEBECO study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical and machine learning models for classification of human wear and delivery days in accelerometry data 90%
- On the reliability of wearable technology: A tutorial on measuring heart rate and heart rate variability in the wild 90%
- Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units in active range of motion assessment in the hip joint 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physical activity and posture profile of a South African cohort of middle-aged men and women as determined by integrated hip and thigh accelerometry 97%
- Descriptive epidemiology of cardiorespiratory fitness in UK adults: The Fenland Study 94%
- Polygenic score for physical activity provides odds for multiple common diseases 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.