Is ultrasound imaging effective in teaching anatomy in undergraduate medicine? A systematic review protocol
Powell, E.; Hammond, L.; Marlowe, F.
Show abstract
Anatomy knowledge is a foundation of learning medicine and is traditionally taught to students using cadaveric dissection. In the last few decades, a variety of adjuncts to teaching anatomy have been developed including plastic models, plastinated human specimens, living anatomy (surface) and radiological images to aid learning. Portable ultrasound (US) has become a useful learning tool that is safe and non-invasive allowing for visualisation of organs and associated structures. The role of ultrasound has been widely discussed in the literature with some institutions integrating it into the medical curriculum. This protocol describes a planned study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound in teaching anatomy to medical students by systematically reviewing the existing literature available in the public domain. Data gathered by these studies can be extracted and analysed to provide evidence of the effectiveness of ultrasound in medical education. The outcome will potentially support medical educators in integrating ultrasound aided learning into the curriculum with the aim of improving students understanding of anatomy. A secondary outcome may be basic understanding and competency in ultrasound.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 94%
- Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Instruction for Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Physician Associate Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study 93%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 88%
- Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts 88%
- Cancer risk perception and knowledge and physician communication behaviors: specific influences on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening in women 50-65 years old 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 91%
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 91%
- Developing a video expert panel as a reference standard to evaluate respiratory rate counting in paediatric pneumonia diagnosis: protocol for a cross-sectional study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 92%
- Longitudinal ultrasonic dimensions and parametric solid models of the gravid uterus and cervix 92%
- Contrast-Enhanced Micro-CT Imaging of a Foetal Female Pelvic Floor Reveals Anatomical Details 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 91%
- Factors determining success of the chronically instrumented unanesthetized fetal sheep model of human development: a retrospective cohort study 89%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.