For She had Eyes and Chose Preprints - Social Media Impact, Citation and Publication rates of Ophthalmology preprints
Menshawey, R.; Menshawey, E.; Massoud, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPreprinting, is the sharing of non-peer reviewed, unpublished scholarly manuscripts. Across many fields of medicine, an exponential rise of manuscripts being posted to preprint servers has been observed. This has exploded during the COVID19 pandemic where early dissemination of information was critical, or where COVID19 priority disrupted the publication dynamics and priorities in other areas. We examined the characteristics of ophthalmology related preprints in this study. MethodsWe searched the bioRxiv and medRxiv servers for preprints relating to field of ophthalmology. Preprints were screened by title and abstract to ensure they were related to the field of ophthalmology. Outcomes included number of tweets, upper bound followers of tweeters, number of citations, news outlets reports and dates posted/published. If a preprint was published the same outcomes were collected for the published version to allow for comparisons, as well as journal publisher and cite score. ResultsAfter screening, a total of 720 preprints met our inclusion criteria. 420 of the preprints went on to be published. The publication rate of the preprints was 58.3%. The median number of tweets received on preprints was 3.5, IQR 5.5. 98.75% of preprints were tweeted about. Citation rate was 40.14%. The average number of days from date posted on server to date published was 180.5{+/-}124 days. Regression analysis revealed that tweets as a preprint predicts tweets as a published article, P=0.0135. citations as a preprint predicts citations as a published article, P<0.001. The average cite score was 8.5{+/-}6.2 among those preprints that we published in journals. 16.66% of papers were published by Elsevier (n = 70). 3.19% of preprints were COVID19 related, with significant differences found between them and non-COVID19 preprints in terms of number of tweets and number of citations. ConclusionsOphthalmology preprints are increasing across preprint servers. This maybe to bypass publication times and allow early dissemination of work, as well as increase visibility and citations. We identified that preprint citations and tweets predict published version citation and tweets.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Increasing frequency of hospital admissions for retinal detachment and vitreo-retinal surgery in England 2000-2018 91%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 90%
- Microplastics Identified in Commercial Over-the-counter Lubricant Eyedrops 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitudes and Practices of Open Data, Preprinting, and Peer-review - a Cross Sectional Study on Croatian Scientists 94%
- Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: a survey of bioRxiv authors 94%
- Woman Authorship in Pre-print Versus Peer-Reviewed Oral Health-Related Publications: A Two-Year Observational Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project 93%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 93%
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 92%
- Unveiling the Clinical Incapabilities: A Benchmarking Study of GPT-4V(ision) for Ophthalmic Multimodal Image Analysis 91%
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.