Back

A novel cuproptosis-related gene signature for the prediction of liver cancer prognosis identified DLAT is a potential therapeutic target

Xu, D.; Yang, F.; Yang, C.; Zhu, H.; Sun, H.; Shen, T.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, G.; Chen, D.; Yang, X.; Lin, K.; Xia, C.

2022-10-25 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.10.23.22280648 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeThe liver cancer (LC) is a highly malignant tumor of the digestive system with a poor prognosis. Cuproptosis is a new type of regulated cell death that has been found by researchers. The expression of cuproptosis-related genes in LC and their relevance to prognosis, on the other hand, remain unknown. This study aimed to explore a gene signature to predict the liver cancer prognosis and identified the vital gene. Experimental approachThe expression patterns of RNA and related clinical data of 371 LC patients were obtained based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were acquired by comparing tumors with adjacent normal samples. Genes displaying significant association with OS were screened through univariate Cox regression analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. All cases were classified into the validation or training group to validate the constructed gene signature. We conducted real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and assays for transwell invasion, CCK-8, and colony formation to determine the biological roles of DLAT. Key ResultsThe differential expression of twelve cuproptosis regulators in LC and normal liver tissues was discovered in this investigation. DEGs can be used to distinguish between two forms of LC. Cuproptosis-related genes were evaluated for survival predictive significance using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. A 3-gene signature based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression was used to categorize an LC patient cohort from the TCGA into low- and high-risk categories. Patients in the low-risk group had a considerably higher likelihood of surviving (P = 0.05) than those in the high-risk group. When paired with clinical parameters, risk score was an independent predictor in predicting the OS of patients with LC. Conclusions & ImplicationsCuproptosis-related genes thus play an important role in tumor formation and can be used to predict the prognosis of LC patients. DLAT has the best prognostic value and can be a therapeutic target for liver cancer.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.8%
3
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
4
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Cell & Bioscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
19
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Virologica Sinica
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
25
Molecular Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%