Back

The Gender Gap Amongst Doctoral Students in the Biomedical Sciences

Schaller, M. D.

2022-10-19 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2022.10.18.512765 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Historically women have been underrepresented in STEM careers. While the number of women receiving doctorate degrees in the biological sciences has exceeded the number of men since approximately 2005, there is still a disparity between the sexes at more advanced career stages. Achieving equity is an important social goal and there is an expected benefit to science since diverse groups outperform homogeneous groups. There are many factors that contribute to the disparity between men and women in science, including a disparity in research productivity. While many studies have documented this "productivity paradox" and examined factors driving this disparity, few studies have addressed differences in productivity between men and women doctoral students. This is an important population to assess since the individuals are in the formative stages of their academic career and differences in productivity could have a significant impact on career progression. This study addresses this question and identified more than 42,000 doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences working with over 16,000 advisors at 235 institutions in the United States and finds a disparity in research productivity between men and women. Men produce >10% more first author papers, >15% more total papers and their first author papers receive >17% more citations. The findings establish the generality of the gender gap in research productivity among doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences. Redressing this gap at the formative stage of young scientists careers, when they are establishing their credentials to advance in their field, is important to address the disparity between the sexes in the biomedical workforce.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.0%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.0%
5
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
7
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
13
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
22
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
28
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%