Back

Age-related disparity of survival outcomes and treatment-related adverse events in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Meng, L.; Thapa, R.; Delgado, M. G.; Gomez, M. F.; Ji, R.; Knepper, T. C.; Hubbard, J. M.; Wang, X.; Permuth, J. B.; Kim, R. D.; Laber, D. A.; Xie, H.

2022-10-10 oncology
10.1101/2022.10.08.22280865 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWhile the incidence of newly diagnosed early-onset colorectal cancer has been increasing, age-related disparity of survival outcome and treatment-related adverse events in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has been inadequately studied with inconclusive findings. In this study, we aimed to evaluate such age-related disparity in this patient population. MethodsWe used individual patient data from three clinical trials (Study 1: NCT00272051, NCT 00305188 and Study 2: NCT00364013) in Project Data Sphere. All patients were diagnosed with mCRC and received first-line 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. Clinical and genomic data of 763 patients with mCRC from Moffitt Cancer Center were used to assess genomic alterations and serve as an external and real-world validation cohort to evaluate overall survival (OS) disparity. Survival outcomes and treatment-related adverse events were estimated and compared in patients among three age groups: <50, 50-65, and >65 years. ResultsAmong 1223 patients from previous clinical trials, 179 (14.6%) were younger than 50 years. These patients had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=1.46; 95%CI=1.22-1.76; p<0.001) and OS (HR=1.48; 95%CI=1.19-1.84; p<0.001) compared to patients in the 50-65 group of both Study 1 and Study 2 after adjustment for gender, race, and performance status. Significantly shorter OS was also observed in patients from the <50 group in the Moffitt cohort. When compared to other age groups, the <50 group had significantly higher incidence of nausea/vomiting (69.3% vs 57.6% vs 60.4%, p=0.019), severe abdominal pain (8.4% vs 3.4% vs 3.5%, p=0.018), severe anemia (6.1% vs 1.0% vs 1.5%, p<0.001), and severe rash (2.8% vs 1.2% vs 0.4%, p=0.047), but significantly lower incidence of fatigue, severe diarrhea, severe fatigue, and severe neutropenia. The <50 group had earlier onset of nausea/vomiting (1.0 vs 2.1 vs 2.6 weeks, p=0.012), mucositis (3.6 vs 5.1 vs 5.7 weeks, p=0.051), and neutropenia (8.0 vs 9.4 vs 8.4 weeks, p=0.043), and shorter duration of mucositis (0.6 vs 0.9 vs 1.0 weeks, p=0.006). In the <50 group, severe abdominal pain and severe liver toxicity were associated with both shorter OS and PFS. In contrast, moderate peripheral neuropathy was associated with longer PFS. Our genomic data showed that the <50 group had higher prevalence of CTNNB1 mutation (6.6% vs 3.1% vs 2.3%, p=0.047), ERBB2 amplification (5.1% vs 0.6% vs 2.3%, p=0.005), and CREBBP mutation (3.1% vs 0.9% vs 0.5%, p=0.050), but lower prevalence of BRAF mutation (7.7% vs 8.5% vs 16.7%, p=0.002). ConclusionsPatients with early-onset mCRC had worse survival outcome and unique adverse-event patterns, which could be partially attributed to distinct genomic profiles. Our findings might improve an individualized approach to chemotherapy, counseling, and management of treatment-related adverse events in this patient population.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
4
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%