Back

A simple non-invasive C reactive protein-based score can predict outcome in patients with COVID-19

Scotto, R.; Lanzardo, A.; Buonomo, A. R.; Pinchera, B.; Cattaneo, L.; Sardanelli, A.; Mercinelli, S.; Viceconte, G.; Zappulo, E.; Villari, R.; Foggia, M.; Gentile, I.; Federico II COVID-team,

2022-09-30 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.09.29.22280522 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe evaluated the role of CRP and other laboratory parameters in predicting the worsening of clinical conditions during hospitalization, ICU admission and fatal outcome among patients with COVID-19. MethodsWe enrolled consecutive adult inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and respiratory symptoms treated in three different COVID centres. We looked for laboratory parameters collected within 48 hours from hospital admission as predictors of clinical condition. ResultsThree-hundred ninety patients were included in the study. At the correlation and regression analysis, age, baseline CRP and LDH were associated with a P/F ratio<200 during hospitalization. At the multivariate analysis, male gender and CRP > 60 mg/l at admission showed to be independently associated with ICU admission. Lymphocytes<1000 cell/L at admission were associated with worst P/F ratio. The only laboratory predictor of fatal outcome was CRP>60 mg/l at admission. Based on these results, we devised an 11-points numeric ordinary score based on age, sex, CRP and LDH at admission (ASCL score). Patients with ASCL score of 0 or 2 showed to be protected against a P/F ratio<200, while patients with ASCL score of 6, 7 and 8 showed to be at risk for P/F ratio<200. Patients with ASCL score[&ge;]7 had a significant increase to die during the hospitalization. ConclusionsPatients with CRP>60 mg/l or LDH>300 IU/l at hospital admission, as well as patients with an ASCL score>6 at hospital admission, should be prioritized for careful respiratory function monitoring and early treatment to prevent a progression of the disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.