Back

The necessity of pyloric drainage in esophagectomies: protocol of a meta-analysis and a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Csontos, A.; Nemeth, D.; Szako, L.; Berke, G.; Sindler, L. D.; Hegyi, P.; Papp, A.

2022-08-24 surgery
10.1101/2022.08.24.22279164 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEsophageal carcinoma is the 8th most common malignant tumour in the world with more than 600 000 cases (3.1% of all), while being the 6th most common reason of tumour mortality, causing more than 500 000 deaths (5.5% of all) annually. The 1, 3 and 5 year-prevalence are 2.4%, 1.6% and 1.3% respectively. The question of this meta-analysis is whether pyloric drainage is preferable over the lack of pyloric drainage during elective esophagectomies in patients suffering from esophageal cancer, regarding mortality, anastomosis leakage, respiratory morbidity, vomiting, gastric emptying time. MethodsWe plan to identify randomized controlled trials to investigate the question by performing extensive search in multiple databases. Based on of predefined criteria, two independent authors will perform the steps of selection, after which appropriate statistical analysis will be performed to identify potential significant differences. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, and GRADE approach will be used to estimate the risk of bias and quality of results. Dissemination plansWe plan to distribute our results in peer-reviewed journal.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.