Effects of metformin use in pregnant women on maternal and infant outcomes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wang, K.; pan, r.; wang, y.
Show abstract
IntroductionMetformin has been considered for use in women who are overweight or obese and with pre-existing type 2 diabetes(T2DM) or gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM). Nevertheless, few studies have weighed the pros and cons of maternal metformin use on offspring and womens perinatal health. We determined to ascertain whether the insulin sensitiser metformin improves fetal and maternal outcomes in Pregnant women with type 2 diabetes or with a BMI no less than 24 kg/m2 Methods and analysisThe protocol was formulated according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Exhaustive literature searches of electronic bibliographic databases will be conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial, OvidSP and ScienceDirect. We used a predefined data extraction table to perform data extraction, and publication bias measurement for each study will be accomplished through the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. The statistical analyses will be performed using RevMan (5.4.1; The Cochrane Collaboration) and STATA (17). Heterogeneity will be assessed using the Q and I2 test, with a value of I2 > 50% being considered substantial. The extent of publication bias will be investigated by visual assessment of a funnel plot and using Eggers test, Beggs test, and Harbords test if ten or more trials are pooled. Ethics and disseminationPatients consent and Ethical approval are not requisites. The complete analysis will be published in an international open-access journal and translational articles to disseminate the results to clinical internists. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022347084 Strengths and limitations of this study{blacktriangleright} This review will comprehensively assess published English-language studies without period or geographical restrictions. {blacktriangleright}This system review plan strictly follows preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) {blacktriangleright}Included studies will be limited to RCTs, which have a high degree of internal consistency and are not representative of the real world. {blacktriangleright}As is the case with most meta-analyses, there may be significant and unexplained heterogeneity in this study.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- Transforming Obesity Prevention for CHILDren (TOPCHILD) Collaboration: protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity 94%
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Clinical outcomes due to COVID-19. Protocol of a systematic literature review 95%
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 94%
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 92%
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review 92%
- Effect of Midwife-Led Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Prolapse Symptoms and Quality of Life in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Ethiopia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials 93%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 93%
- Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomized trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corticosteroids for improving patient relevant outcomes in HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- The prevalence of mental ill-health in women during pregnancy and after childbirth during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis 92%
- Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.