Back

Kick the wheels: radiograph-negative ankle injuries in bicycle-spoke accidents

Laumer, S. J.; van Kooten, L.; Barten, D. G.; van Osch, F. H.; Drees, M. M.; Lekx, A. W.

2022-07-27 emergency medicine
10.1101/2022.07.26.22278082 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionBicycle spoke injuries (BSIs) in children are notorious for the presence of Salter Harris type 1 (SH1) fractures. Most patients are therefore treated with cast immobilization. However, the actual prevalence of SH1 following a BSI is unknown. In this study, we aimed to describe a cohort with radiograph-negative BSIs and to identify possible clinical predictors for SH1 which might be useful for adequate risk assessment. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed, including all children [≤]12 years visiting our Emergency Department (ED) with a BSI. Patients without radiographic evidence of a fracture were classified as low or high level of suspicion of SH1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of a high level of suspicion of SH1. ResultsIn total, 323 patients were included. Ninety-three patients (29%) had a proven fracture; 230 patients were radiograph-negative at first presentation. Of these, 166 patients (72%) were treated with cast immobilization. At follow-up, 32 patients (13.9%) were classified as high level of suspicion of SH1. No clinical variables were found to be predictive for SH1. Local tenderness at the lateral malleolus was associated with a high level of suspicion of SH1, however, this was not statistically significant (OR 2.89, p-value 0.057). ConclusionAlthough BSIs with radiograph-negative ankle injuries are generally treated with cast immobilization, in this cohort only 13.9% had a high level of suspicion of SH1. Lateral malleolus tenderness was associated with a high level of suspicion of SH1 injury, but none of the clinical variables had a significant predictive value.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.