Back

Frameshift Mutations in the Microevolution and Macroevolution of Viruses

Yufei, J.; Jianwei, S.; Minghui, S.; Guohui, L.; Huanyu, G.; Ruixu, C.; Chen, J.-M.

2022-08-31 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.07.20.500745 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Some nucleotide insertions or deletions (indels) in open reading frames of virus genes lead to frameshift mutations (FSMs), which can drastically change amino acid sequences. Most FSMs are deleterious and inhibited by natural selection, but some FSMs could aid viruses in adapting to new hosts, escaping immunity, or changing viral pathogenicity or transmissibility. Surprisingly, various fundamental aspects of FSMs in virus evolution remain unknown. In this report, we identified 679 FSMs in the genomes of viruses from 13 randomly selected animal virus families using randomly selected sequences. The 679 FSMs were formed with 1-5 indels, and most (89.4%) FSMs were fixed through the compensatory mechanism with two indels. Each FSM changed 3-209 (mean=15.4, median=13) amino acid residues. FSM frequencies were usually higher in viral sequences with lower sequence identities and steeply increased when sequence identities declined to 60.0%-69.9% or 70.0%-79.9%. This suggests that FSMs are more important to the macroevolution (i.e., inter-species evolution, including speciation) than to the microevolution (i.e., intra-species evolution) of viruses. This study provided novel evidence for the hopeful monster hypothesis in evolutionary biology. Furthermore, we found that FSMs occurred at different frequencies among genes in the same virus genomes and among virus families. Collectively, this study revealed multiple fundamental features of FSMs in virus evolution for the first time and provided novel insights into the mechanisms of macroevolution and speciation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.