Back

The Impact of Self-Management-Based Care Interventions on Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Philosophical Perspective

Fadli, F.

2022-06-28 nursing
10.1101/2022.06.27.22276988 medRxiv
Show abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is caused by the disruption of insulin secretion and resistance. One aspect that plays an important role in this disease is self-management education. Good self-care behavior facilitates controlled diabetes management and prevents complications as well as ensures a better life quality. This literature aims to study the philosophy of diabetes self-management based care interventions to improve the quality of life viewed from philosophical perspectives. A literature search was performed on Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and Science Direct using keywords including type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetes self-management and quality of life. The inclusion criteria are peer-reviewed articles in English that discuss diabetes self-management and quality of life. Articles published within the last five years (2017-2021). Research such as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and full text method. Based on the philosophy study self care interventions, eight articles showed that self-management interventions provide significant effectiveness for lifestyle changes and self-care for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Eight articles were selected based on an axiological philosophical study approach, six of which discussed self-management interventions effect on self-care behavior, and two measured the quality of life of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Almost all the articles stated an increase in self-care behaviors and quality of life after receiving self-management interventions. Successful diabetes self-management depends on individual self-care activities to control symptoms presented. Furthermore, regular self-management activities prevent complications from arising. Therefore, patients compliance with diabetes self-management is needed to improve their life quality.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.