Side effects of Covishield vaccine among frontline healthcare workers of a tertiary health care center
Dhungana, D.; Regmi, Y. N.; Shrestha, D.; Thapa, K.; Pun, C. B.; Upadhaya, T.; Hirachan, G.
Show abstract
ObjectivesCOVID disease started in the late 2019 and within a short time became a pandemic disease. With the increasing morbidity and mortality all over the world and the therapeutics not doing wonders, scientists were in the attempt to develop vaccines as a mitigating measure. With continuous efforts and developments, different vaccines were developed and rolled out gradually in different countries. Concerns were notable for occurrence of side effects. Hence this study was done to assess the side effects following Covishield vaccination in Nepal at the initial stage. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study done via snowball sampling method among healthcare workers at a tertiary medical college hospital in Pokhara, Nepal after obtaining ethical consent from the institutional review committee of the concerned hospital. The proforma was sent via online means through different social media platforms and also printed forms were also given to the respondents. A total of 139 respondents were obtained after removing duplications. The data were entered into SPSS and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. P-value [≤] 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsMajority (64.7%) were female healthcare workers. More than half (52.3%) used pre-medication in an attempt to avoid the side effects of vaccine. Most (90.6%) reported at least one side effect-local or systemic to the first dose and approximately three-quarter (74.3%) reported side effect to the second dose. Common side effects were pain at injection site, muscle pain, headache, fatigue and weakness. Most of the side effects were higher with the first dose as compared to the second dose. ConclusionSide effects are common with Covishield vaccination, significantly more with the first dose as compared to the second dose. Female gender, younger age and past covid infection were associated with slightly more occurrence of side effects; however were not found to be statistically significant.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in Pakistan Among Health Care Workers 97%
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 97%
- Acceptance and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Breakthrough infection with SARS-CoV-2 and its predictors among healthcare workers in a medical college and hospital complex in Delhi, India 95%
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 94%
- Clearing the fog: Is Hydroxychloroquine effective in reducing Corona virus disease-2019 progression: A randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 95%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity after booster dose with AZD1222 via intradermal route among adult who had received CoronaVac 94%
- Midwives’ attitudes toward participation of pregnant women in a preventive vaccine hypothetical clinical trial 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.