The Survival Analysis Of Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Dataset
Ewuru, D. A.; Ilker, E.
Show abstract
AIMThis study will describe the notion about survival analysis and the variability between diverse methods and test statistics used in analyzing survival data. METHODSThis study will be using the Veterans Administrative Lung Cancer dataset(R Dataset) of 137 patients having advanced inoperable Lung cancer, carried out by the US Veterans Administration. Out of 137 male patients, 69 patients received the Standard test while 68 patients received Chemotherapy test and 64 patients died in each treatment group while only 9 patients were alive (censored) at the end of the study. This dataset will be analyzed using the SPSS version to determine whether there is a statistically remarkable difference between the survival distributions of the cell types of Lung cancer using Life tables, and also between the Standard test and Chemotherapy test treatment groups using Kaplan Meier method. Various covariates were also analyzed to find out if they have any effect on the death of the male patients with advanced inoperable lung cancer using Cox-Regression. RESULTSThe Wilcoxon (Gehan) statistic from Life table method shows a p-value of 0.000 less than the 95% confidence level indicating that there is a statistical significance between the Lung cancer cell types. The three statistical tests of Kaplan-Meier method which include Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test, Breslow (Generalized Wilcoxon) and Tarone Ware tests showed that the survival distribution between the two Lung cancer treatment groups are equal using an alpha level of 0.05.The Standard test and the Chemotherapy test drug treatment show the same effect on the survival time of the patients, no treatment is more beneficial than the other. Cox Regression result showed that Squamous cell type2(4), Adeno-carcinoma cell type (1), Small cell type (3) and karnofsky score are statistically significant while Large cell type2 (2), prior therapy, age, diagnosis time and the treatment group were found not significant. CONCLUSIONThe treatment difference does not show any remarkable effect on the survival time of male patients with Lung Cancer.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 95%
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 93%
- A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 95%
- Prediction and analysis of skin cancer progression using genomics profiles of patients 94%
- Machine learning prediction of antiviral-HPV protein interactions for anti-HPV pharmacotherapy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening of plasma IL-6 and IL-17 in Bangladeshi lung cancer patients 95%
- A small H2O-soluble ingredient of royal jelly lower cholesterol levels in liver cells by suppressing squalene epoxidase 93%
- Analysis of serum trace elements, macro-minerals, antioxidants, malondialdehyde and immunoglobulins in seborrheic dermatitis patients: A case-control investigation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of physical activity among the students of an Indian university and their perceptions about the curricular content concerned with health 92%
- In-silico development of a method for the selection of optimal enzymes using L-asparaginase II against Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia as an example. 92%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Niger State: A Pilot Cross Sectional Study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.