Back

Association of history of metformin use with delirium and mortality: A retrospective cohort study

Yamanashi, T.; Anderson, Z.-E. E.; Modukuri, M.; Chang, G.; Tran, T.; Marra, P. S.; Wahba, N. E.; Crutchley, K. J.; Sullivan, E. J.; Jellison, S. S.; Comp, K. R.; Akers, C. C.; Meyer, A. A.; Lee, S.; Iwata, M.; Cho, H. R.; Shinozaki, E.; Shinozaki, G.

2022-04-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.04.03.22273209 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between history of metformin use and delirium risk, as well as long-term mortality. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, subjects recruited between January 2016 and March 2020 were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between metformin use and delirium. Log-rank analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to investigate the relationship between metformin use and 3-year mortality. ResultsThe data from 1404 subjects were analyzed. 242 subjects were categorized into a DM-without-metformin group, and 264 subjects were categorized into a DM-with-metformin group. Prevalence of delirium was 36.0% in the DM-without-metformin group, and 29.2% in the DM-with-metformin group. A history of metformin use reduced the risk of delirium in patients with DM (OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.79]) after controlling for age, sex, and dementia status, body mass index (BMI), and insulin use. The 3-year mortality in the DM-without-metformin group (survival rate, 0.595 [95% CI, 0.512 to 0.669]) was higher than in the DM-with-metformin group (survival rate, 0.695 [95% CI, 0.604 to 0.770]) (p=0.035). A history of metformin use decreased the risk of 3-year mortality after adjustment for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, BMI, history of insulin use, and delirium status (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.98]). ConclusionsIt was found that metformin usage was associated with decreased delirium prevalence and lower 3-year mortality. The potential benefit of metformin on delirium risk and mortality were shown.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
2
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
5
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
13
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
14
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
23
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
25
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Journal of Parkinson’s Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
30
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%