Impact assessment of mobility restriction, testing, and vaccination on the COVID-19 pandemic in India
Shin, J.; Khuong, Q. L.; Abbas, K.; Oh, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundBefore the availability of vaccines, countries largely relied on mobility restriction and testing to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Our aim is to assess the combined impact of mobility restriction, testing, and vaccination on the COVID-19 pandemic in India. MethodsWe conducted a multiple regression analysis to assess the impact of mobility, testing, and vaccination on COVID-19 incidence between April 28, 2021 to November 24, 2021 using data from Our World in Data and Google Mobility Report. The 7-day moving average was applied to offset the daily fluctuations in the mobility and testing. Each independent variable was lagged to construct a temporal relationship, and waning vaccination efficacy was taken into consideration. We performed additional analysis for three time periods between March 28, 2020 to November 24, 2021 (1st: March 28, 2020 [~] October 7, 2020, 2nd: October 8, 2020 [~] April 27, 2021, 3rd: April 28, 2021 [~] November 24, 2021) to examine potential heterogeneity over time. ResultsMobility (0.041, 95% CI: 0.033 to 0.048), testing (-0.008, 95% CI: -0.015 to -0.001), and vaccination (quadratic term: 0.004, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.005, linear term: -0.130, 95% CI: -0.161 to -0.099) were all associated with COVID-19 incidence. For vaccination rate, the decrease of number of cases demonstrated a U-shaped curve, while mobility showed a positive association and testing showed an inverse association with COVID-19 incidence. Mobility restriction was effective during all three periods - March 28, 2020 to November 24, 2021 (0.009, 0.048, and 0.026 respectively). Testing was effective during the second and third period - October 8, 2020 to November 24, 2021 (-0.036, and -0.006 respectively). ConclusionMobility restriction and testing were effective even in the presence of vaccination. This shows the positive value of mobility restrictions, testing, and vaccination from the health system perspective on COVID-19 prevention and control, especially with continual emergence of variants in India and globally. At the same time, this health system gain must be balanced with the challenges in the delivery of non-COVID health services and broader socio-economic impact in deciding the prolonged continuance of mobility restriction.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of COVID-19 Pandemic in Nepal: A Lockdown Scenario Analysis 95%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
- The impact of armed conflict on the epidemiological situation of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Libya, Syria, and Yemen 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An After-Action Review of COVID-19 Cases and Mitigation Measures at US Mission India, March 2020-July 2021 94%
- Impact of school closures and reopening on COVID-19 caseload in 6 cities of Pakistan: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis 94%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia 94%
- Socio-demographic determinants of monkeypox virus preventive behavior: a cross-sectional study in Pakistan 94%
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: A longitudinal household cross-sectional study 92%
- Vaccine confidence and timeliness of childhood immunisation by health information source, maternal, socioeconomic, and geographic characteristics in Albania 92%
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.