Enhanced Recovery After Surgery reduced length of stay after colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital in Ontario
Allen, L. R.; Roldan, H.; Brown, A.; Radey, J.; Hogenbirk, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs include preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical pathways to improve quality of patient care while reducing length of stay and readmission. This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of an ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery implemented over two-years in a small, resource-challenged rural hospital. Study designA prospective cohort study used retrospectively matched controls to assess the effect of ERAS on LOS in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in a small rural hospital in northern Ontario, Canada. ERAS patients were matched to two patients in the control group based on diagnosis, age and gender. Patients had open or laparoscopic colorectal surgeries, with those in the intervention group treated per ERAS protocol and given instructions on pre- and post-operative self-care. ResultsMost ERAS patients reported adherence to ERAS protocols prior to surgery. Approximately one quarter of patients chose not to complete the postoperative survey. Of those who completed the survey, adherence to protocol was strongest for chewing gum in the days after surgery. Most patients were sitting in a chair for their afternoon meal by the first day and most were walking down the hallway by the second day. The control and ERAS patient groups did not differ significantly (p[≥]0.07) in age ([Formula]years, sd=13.1), gender (52% male), nor in the Canadian Classification of Health Interventions 5-character code. The control group significantly higher (p<0.001) malignant neoplasm of colon (C18, 69% vs 35%), and significantly lower malignant neoplasm of rectum (C20, 0% vs 5%), relative to the ERAS group. The control group had an average ln-transformed LOS that was significantly longer (exponentiated as 1.7 days) than ERAS patients (t-test, p<0.001). ConclusionThis study found that ERAS could be implemented in a small rural hospital and provided evidence for a reduced LOS of approximately two days.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unplanned Hospital Visits after Ambulatory Surgical Care 96%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 95%
- Risk Factors for Early PICC Removal: A Retrospective Study of Adult Inpatients at an Academic Medical Center 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of pre and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery 94%
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 94%
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 90%
- Appropriate management of steroids and discharge planning during and after hospital admission for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis 89%
- Prune intake ameliorates chronic constipation symptoms and causes little discomfort from diarrhea and loose stools: A randomized placebo-controlled trial 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.