Impact of diabetes mellitus on the stabilization and osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic review
Katsiroumpa, A.; Galanis, P. A.; Diamantis, I.; Georgikopoulou, S.; Katsoulas, T.; Katsimperi, E.; Konstantinou, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionDiabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder leading to hyperglycemia, which causes various complications due to vasculopathy. Adequate dental rehabilitation including dental implants plays a key role in promoting the eating habits of diabetics and better metabolic control. AimWe performed a systematic literature review to investigate the effect of diabetes mellitus on the stabilization and osseointegration of dental implants. MethodsWe searched PubMed and Scopus until October 2021. We used the following inclusion criteria: (i) study population included diabetics type I or II, (ii) outcomes were the dental implant failure or resonance frequency analysis, (iii) studies that investigate the effect of diabetes mellitus on the stabilization and osseointegration of dental implants, (iv) studies that were published in English, (v) studies that were published in journals with peer review system, (vi) studies including humans and not animals, (vii) studies that compared diabetics with non-diabetics, and (ix) quantitative studies. ResultsTwenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Regarding implant failure, four studies found statistically significant more frequent implant failure in diabetics, while five studies found that implant failure was more frequent in diabetics but was not statistically significant. In contrast, ten studies found that implant failure was more frequent in non-diabetics but was not statistically significant. In addition, seven studies found that all diabetics and non-diabetics retained their implant during the study. In six studies that performed the resonance frequency analysis, no statistically significant difference was found between diabetics and non-diabetics. In three studies, the mean value of the implant stability quotient increased statistically significant in non-diabetics, while in three studies the mean value of the implant stability quotient increased statistically significant in diabetics. ConclusionsThe results of this review suggest that implant failure is not higher for diabetics than for non-diabetics. Diabetics seem to be able to achieve a rate of dental implants survival like that of non-diabetics. With regards to the resonance frequency analysis, no difference is found between diabetics and non-diabetics.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Which surface treatment improves the long-term repair bond strength of aged methacrylate-based composite resin restorations? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
- EGCG-modified bone graft to modulate the recruitment of M1 macrophage and alleviate the forming of fibrous capsule 91%
- Evaluation of RNA extraction free method for detection of SARS-COV-2 in salivary samples for mass screening for COVID-19 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and aptitude of early childhood, primary and/or secondary education teachers referred to first aid measures in dental trauma in the province of Seville (Spain.) 95%
- Different features of cholera in malnourished and non-malnourised children: analysis of 10-year surveillance data from a large diarrheal disease hospital in urban Bangladesh 85%
- Cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging of calf muscle contraction in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy and healthy children: comparison of voluntary motion and electrically evoked motion 84%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.