Targeting the fronto-parietal network using multifocal personalized transcranial alternating current stimulation to enhance motor sequence learning in healthy older adults
Draaisma, L. R.; Wessel, M. J.; Moyne, M.; Morishita, T.; Hummel, F. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundHealthy older adults show a decrease in motor learning capacity as well as in working memory (WM) performance. WM has been suggested to be involved in motor learning processes, such as sequence learning. Correlational evidence has shown the involvement of the fronto-parietal network (FPN), a network underlying WM processes, in motor sequence learning. However, causal evidence is currently lacking. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) studies have focused so far predominantly on motor related areas to enhance motor sequence learning while areas associated with more cognitive aspects of motor learning have not yet been addressed. HypothesisIn this study, we aim to provide causal evidence for the involvement of WM processes and the underlying FPN in successful motor sequence learning by using a theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) paradigm targeting the FPN during motor sequence learning. MethodsIn a cohort of 20 healthy older adults, we applied bifocal tACS in the theta range to the FPN during a sequence learning task. With the use of a double-blind, cross-over design, we tested the efficacy of active compared with sham stimulation. Two versions of the motor task were used: one with high and one with low WM load, to explore the efficacy of stimulation on tasks differing in WM demand. Additionally, the effects of stimulation on WM performance were addressed using an N-back task. The tACS frequency was personalized by means of EEG measuring the individual theta peak frequency during the N-back task. ResultsThe application of personalized theta tACS to the FPN improved performance on the motor sequence learning task with high WM load (p <.001), but not with low WM load. Active stimulation significantly improved both speed (p <.001), and accuracy (p =.03) during the task with high WM load. In addition, the stimulation paradigm improved performance on the N-back task for the 2-back task (p = .013), but not for 1-back and 3-back. ConclusionMotor sequence learning can be enhanced with the use of personalized bifocal theta tACS to the FPN when WM load is high. This indicates that the efficacy of this stimulation paradigm is dependent on the cognitive demand during the learning task and provides further causal evidence for the critical involvement of WM processes and the FPN in motor sequence learning in healthy older adults. These findings open new exciting possibilities to counteract the age-related decline in motor learning capacity and WM performance.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 97%
- Anodal M1 tDCS enhances online learning of rhythmic timing videogame skill 96%
- Alpha Neurofeedback Training with a portable Low-Priced and Commercially Available EEG Device Leads to Faster Alpha Enhancement.A Single-blind, Sham-feedback Controlled Study & Methodological Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on exploration and exploitation during uncertain decision-making 97%
- TMS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects the timing of motor imagery but not overt action: further support for the Motor-Cognitive model 94%
- Effects of prefrontal tDCS on dopamine-mediated behavior and psychophysiology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transient amplitude modulation of alpha-band oscillations by short-time intermittent closed-loop tACS 94%
- Neural signatures of performance feedback in the paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT): an ERP study 93%
- Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to the Secondary Visual Cortex at 80% Active Motor Threshold Does Not Impair Central Vision in Humans During a Simple Detection Task 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.