Back

The course of COVID-19 in allergic rhinitis patients receiving allergen-specific immunotherapy

ATAYIK, E.; Aytekin, G.

2022-01-31 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2022.01.29.22270072 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe aims of presenting study were trying to expose the course of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus) in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), to compare the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and pneumonia rates in patients with AR receiving allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and patients did not receive AIT (non-receivers) and to define possible risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients with AR. Materials and MethodsA total of 419 patients with AR who were being followed up in a tertiary allergy clinic between 1 June 2020 and 31 December 2020, were selected for the study. Only patients who were receiving active-continuous treatment for allergic rhinitis during the study period, were included in the study. ResultsSeventy-nine patients (18.9%) became infected with the SARS-CoV-2 [32 patients (19.6%) in AR patients with AIT and 47 patients (19.0%) in non-receivers] and the rate of pneumonia was 2.4% [12.7% of SARS-CoV-2 (+) patients]. There was no significant difference was determined between the AR patients with AIT and the non-receivers in regard to the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection, pneumonia, and hospitalization (p: 0.864, p: 0.081, p: 0.113). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of gender, duration of disease, sensitivity to allergens (atopy), and serum IgE levels (p: 0.009, p: 0.001, p: 0.001, and p: 0.001). The accompanying comorbidities, eosinophil count, AIT, and duration of AIT were not found to be associated with an increased risk SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity. However, the female gender was shown to be associated with a decreased risk for SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity (OR, 0.571; 95% confidence interval, 0.330-0.987; p: 0.045) ConclusionThe course of SARS-CoV-2 is similar in patients with AR who underwent AIT and patients with AR who did not undergo AIT, and AIT does not seem to increase the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
6
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
9
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
16
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%