Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine in COVID-19 With Focus on Hospitalized Patients - A Systematic Review
Freilich, D.; Victory, J.; Gadomski, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitalized patients received empiric hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (HC/CQ). Although some retrospective-observational trials suggested potential benefit, all subsequent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) failed to show benefit and use generally ceased. Herein, we summarize key studies that clinicians advising patients on HC/CQs efficacy:safety calculus in hospitalized COVID-19 patients would want to know about in a practical one-stop-shopping source. MethodsPubmed and Google were searched on November 4, 2021. Search words included: COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, in vitro, animal studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses. Studies were assessed for import and included if considered impactful for benefit:risk assessment. ResultsThese searches led to inclusion of 12 in vitro and animal reports; 12 retrospective-observational trials, 19 interventional clinical trials (17 RCTs, 1 single-arm, 1 controlled but unblinded), and 51 meta-analyses in hospitalized patients. Inconsistent efficacy was seen in vitro and in animal studies for coronaviruses and nil in SARS-CoV-2 animal models specifically. Most retrospective-observational studies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients found no efficacy; QT prolongation and increased adverse events and mortality were reported in some. All RCTs and almost all meta-analyses provided robust data showing no benefit in overall populations and subgroups, yet concerning safety issues in many. ConclusionsHC/CQ have inconsistent anti-coronavirus efficacy in vitro and in animal models, and no convincing efficacy yet substantial safety issues in the overwhelming majority of retrospective-observational trials, RCTs, and meta-analyses in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. HC/CQ should not be prescribed for hospitalized COVID-19 patients outside of clinical trials. Key Summary PointsPreclinical hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in vitro studies found inconsistent activity against coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2. Preclinical hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine animals studies found inconsistent efficacy for coronaviruses in general and none for SARS-CoV-2. The overhwelming majority of RCTs and retrospective-observational trials found no benefit for hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and many found concerning safety signals. The majority of RCTs and retrospective-observational trials found no benefit for hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in COVID-19 outpatients or for pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis, and some found concerning safety signals. The overwhelming majority of meta-analyses found no benefit for hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in COVID-19 inpatients, outpatients, or for prophylaxis, and many found concerning safety signals.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 95%
- Safety and Efficacy of Pemivibart, a Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody, for Prevention of Symptomatic COVID-19: Interim Results From the CANOPY Clinical Trial 92%
- A Systematic Review of Human Challenge Trials, Designs, and Safety 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 96%
- An open-label randomized, controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 – Final results from the DisCoVeRy trial 94%
- Antiviral drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 - the DisCoVeRy trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis 94%
- Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oral clarithromycin in COVID-19 of moderate severity: the ACHIEVE open-label trial using concurrent matched comparators 93%
- The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID19 patients : a multicenter national retrospective cohort 93%
- Combination Of Tocilizumab And Steroids To Improve Mortality In Patients With Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Spanish, Multicenter, Cohort Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose as an Adjunct to Standard of Care in the Medical Management of COVID-19: A Proof-of-Concept & Dose-Ranging Randomised Clinical Trial 93%
- Ruxolitinib versus Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19: multicenter matched-controlled study 92%
- Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients Presumed to be Treated with Sotrovimab in NHS Hospitals in England 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.