Back

The Presence of Non-organ-specific Autoantibodies in Chronic Hepatitis C Treatment-naive Patients

de Oliveira Andrade, L. J.; Santos Padilha, I. S.; Matos de Oliveira, L.; Matos de Oliveira, G. C.; Parana, R.

2022-01-10 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.01.07.22268924 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn the patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) various immune-mediated phenomena are described, and non-organ-specific autoantibodies (NOSAs) in particular are common. The aim of the present study was to investigate the NOSAs prevalence in chronic hepatitis c treatment-naive patients. Patients and MethodsSera of 76 consecutive HCV treatment-naive patients were considered to be eligible for this study for evaluation of Anti-nuclear, anti-smooth muscle, anti-mitochondrial, anti-neutrophil-cytoplasmatic and anti-liver/kidney microsomal antibodies. Criteria of eligibility were serum anti-HCV antibody and HCV RNA positivity, chronic inflammation revealed by histological analysis of the liver, genotyping, treatment-naive patients, and no have the diagnosis of probable or definite autoimmune hepatitis. ResultsMean chronological age for the 76 patients (44 females and 32 males) was 51.3 {+/-} 13,9 years (range: 20-67 years). Nineteen patients (25.0%) infected with HCV had detectable levels of NOSAs at before combined antiviral treatment. SMA was present in 16 (21.0%) of 76 patients, ANA in 2 patients (2.6%), and pANCA (perinuclear ANCA) in 1 patients (1.3%). No patient had specimens reactive to AMA, LMK, or cANCA (cytoplasmic ANCA). ConclusionsIn this study, we show the NOSAs positivity in chronic hepatitis c treatment-naive patients. Assigned to high prevalence of SMA positivity is associated with high METAVIR score, and HCV-genotype 1 and 1b, may reflect a release of intracellular antigens at the time of hepatocellular injury triggering immune responses in the form of autoantibody production or a direct infection of immunocytes by the HCV.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.