Applying Machine Learning and AI Explanations to Analyze Vaccine Hesitancy
Lange, C.; Lange, J.
Show abstract
The paper identifies and quantifies the impact of race, poverty, politics and age on COVID-19 vaccination rates in counties across the continental US. Both traditional Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression analysis and Random Forest machine learning algorithms are applied to quantify contributing factors for county level vaccination hesitancy. With the machine learning model, joint effects of multiple variables (race/ethnicity, partisanship, age etc.) are considered simultaneously to capture the unique combination of what factors affect the vaccination rate. By implementing a state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence Explanations (AIX) algorithm, it is possible to solve the black box problem with machine learning models and provide answers to the "how much" question for each measured impact factor in every county. For most counties a higher percentage vote for Republicans, a greater African American population share, and a higher poverty rate lower the vaccination rate. While a higher Asian population share increases the predicted vaccination rate. The impact on the vaccination rate from the Hispanic population proportion is positive in the OLS model, but only positive for counties with very high Hispanic population (65% and more) in the Random Forest model. Both the proportion of seniors and the one for young people in a county have a significant impact in the OLS model -- positive and negative, respectively. In contrast, the impacts are ambiguous in the Random Forest model. Because results vary between geographies and since the AIX algorithm is able to quantify vaccine impacts individually for each county, this research can be tailored to local communities. This way it is a helpful tool for local health officials and other policy makers to improve vaccination rates. An interactive online mapping dashboard that identifies impact factors for individual U.S. counties is available at https://www.cpp.edu/_clange/vacmap.html. It is apparent that the influence of impact factors is not universally the same across different geographies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian Space-time SIR modeling of Covid-19 in two US states during the 2020-2021 pandemic 94%
- Application of Elastic Net Regression for Modeling COVID-19 Sociodemographic Risk Factors 94%
- Public participation in crisis policymaking. How 30,000 Dutch citizens advised their government on relaxing COVID-19 lockdown measures 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 95%
- Evaluating the policy of closing bars and restaurants in Cataluña and its effects on mobility and COVID19 incidence 93%
- Yet another lockdown? A large-scale study on people’s unwillingness to be confined during the first 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multivariate Forecasting Model for the COVID-19 Hospital Census Based on Local Infection Incidence 93%
- General Model for COVID-19 Spreading with Consideration of Intercity Migration, Insufficient Testing and Active Intervention: Application to Study of Pandemic Progression in Japan and USA 90%
- COVID-19 spreading: a recursive model 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.