Back

Correlation between faecal microbial taxa and ulcerative colitis in different phases of disease activity in a north Indian cohort

juyal, g.; Sood, A.; Midha, V.; Singh, A.; Singh, D.; Mahajan, R.; Verma, V.; Bhatanagar, R.; Joshi, M. C.

2022-01-07 gastroenterology
10.1101/2021.12.12.21267614 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsA link between gut microbiota and Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been established in several studies. However, only a few studies have examined specific changes in microbiota associated with different phases of disease activity in UC. In this study, we attempted to identify differentially abundant taxa between (i) UC patients and healthy controls and (ii) different phases of disease activity, in a genetically distinct north Indian (NI) population. Methods16S rRNA (V3-V4) sequencing of 105 patients with UC [newly diagnosed (n=14); patients in remission (n=36) and active disease (relapse, n=55)]; and 36 healthy controls was performed and analysed. ResultsLower gut microbial diversity; enrichment of lactate-producing bacteria namely Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus; and depletion of butyrate-producing bacteria (e.g., Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae), were observed among UC patients. Subgroup analysis revealed differential abundance of Escherichia-Shigella, Streptococcus, Enterococcus and Faecalibacterium in newly diagnosed UC patients. No discrete microbial features were observed between patients in remission and those with active disease. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed a mutualistic association between opportunistic pathogens and Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus and antagonistic relationship with butyrate-producers. ConclusionThis first faecal microbiome study among NI UC cohort elucidated dysanaerobiosis; loss of short chain fatty acid producers and enrichment of inflammation associated microbes; population specific differential microbial genera; and a potential microbial signature for early dysbiosis.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.