Improving Lab Culture Through Self-Assessment: A Case Study
Hernandez, S.; Mumme, R.; Court, L.; El Basha, D.; Gay, S.; Marquez, B.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, K.; Baroudi, H.; Cao, W.; Cardenas, C.; Douglas, R.; Duryea, J.; Kaffey, Z.; Mann, D.; Nealon, K.; Netherton, T.; Nguyen, C.; Oh, K.; Olanrewaju, A.; Sjogreen, C.; Rhee, D. J.; Yang, J.; Yu, C.; Zhang, L. J.; Zhao, Y.; Ziyaee, H.; Gronberg, M.
Show abstract
PurposeMotivated by perceived dissatisfaction within our labs changed working environment brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed a self-assessment of our lab culture through anonymous surveys and live sessions. MethodsIn Survey 1, we asked each lab member to identify and rank up to 10 values that are important for a healthy lab environment. They were then asked to rate how well the lab embodied those values at two time points: before the COVID-19 pandemic while working onsite, and at the time of the survey while working remotely (10 months into the pandemic). In a series of live group sessions, we reviewed relevant literature and the survey results to finalize ten themes. We then reflected on each theme and proposed action items to address any deficiencies. Finally, we conducted Survey 2 after the self-assessment to judge the groups finalized themes, implemented changes, and overall satisfaction with the assessment process. ResultsThemes identified were attitude, accountability, teamwork/collaboration, communication, diversity/inclusion, emotional intelligence, integrity, training, well-being, and adaptability in crisis-management. All lab members liked the self-assessment process and felt their voices were heard. On average, there was a 12% increase in satisfaction across all themes from the start to end of the lab assessment. ConclusionWe successfully assessed the culture of our lab and subsequently improved lab member satisfaction. The success of this team project suggests that other scientific labs could benefit from similar interactive self-assessments.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study 94%
- A CURE for physiological characterization of bacterioplankton in liquid culture 93%
- Biofilms with a dash of color: A hands-on activity for school students to build a biofilm model, and use it to understand antibiotic tolerance in biofilms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies for building computing skills to support microbiome analysis: a five-year perspective from the EDAMAME workshop 89%
- A schema for digitized surface swab site metadata in open-source DNA sequence databases 87%
- Quantifying and understanding well-to-well contamination in microbiome research 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 93%
- Anticipatory Emotions and Academic Performance: The Role of Boredom in a Preservice Teachers' Lab Experience 89%
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The faculty-to-faculty mentorship experience: a survey on challenges and recommendations for improvements 93%
- Characterizing the Modern Light Environment and its Influence on Circadian Rhythms 85%
- Predicting speech-in-noise ability with static and dynamic auditory figure-ground analysis using structural equation modelling 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.