Back

MAL suppresses OSCC tumorigenesis by maintaining epithelial cell differentiation

Chen, W.; Zhu, X.; Liu, Z.; Qi, S.; Zou, X.; Lu, T.; Ke, X.; Qin, X.; Wang, X.; Yan, M.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, W.; Wu, X.

2021-12-02 cell biology
10.1101/2021.12.01.470749 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is widely recognized as an optimal model for precise medicine guided molecular biomarkers of cancer, however, few clinical practices were applied till now. Based on the data from our own studies and published papers, it was found that the expression of MAL was significantly decreased in epithelial cancer as compared with normal tissues, and exhibited a opposite association with pathological grade. To study the molecular events related to deficiency of MAL during carcinogenesis, occurrence and development, a Mal knockout mouse model was constructed and consistently reproduced and bred. The Mal knockout mice are highly vulnerable to tumor induction by carcinogen of 4NQO, evidenced by their extremely earlier carcinogenesis, higher incidence, and more aggressive growth. Analysis of scRNA-seq data indicated that Mal knockout mice lost the ability in maintaining epithelial cell differentiation and get more prone to carcinogen with a remarkably higher incidence of epithelial malignancy. Further analyses identified putative co-functional genes of MAL, including DSG1, AQP3 and S100A8, which are key factors in maintaining epithelial cell differentiation. To conclude, the current study exhibits the clinical significance and explains the tumor suppressing function of MAL. The results also suggest the potential of MAL and its co-functional genes being biomarkers for designing the prevention and/or differentiation therapy strategies in OSCC. SignificanceMAL is found to be strongly opposite with tumor pathological grade from clinical and in vivo studies in OSCC. We propose MAL and its co-functional genes, including DSG1, AQP3 and S100A8, as key factors in maintaining epithelial cell differentiation and are valuable targets for designing prevention and differentiation therapy strategies in OSCC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 5%
13.2%
2
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.3%
3
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Cell Discovery
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
10
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Neuroscience Bulletin
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
16
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
18
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Genes to Cells
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%