Back

Replication Study: RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth

Pelech, S.; Gallagher, C.; Sutter, C.; Yue, L.; Kerwin, J.; Bhargava, A.; Iorns, E.; Tsui, R.; Denis, A.; Perfito, N.; Errington, T. M.

2021-11-30 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.11.30.470372 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As part of the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, we published a Registered Report (Bhargava et al., 2016) that described how we intended to replicate selected experiments from the paper "RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth" (Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). Here we report the results. We found two unrelated RAF inhibitors, PLX4720 or GDC-0879, selectively inhibited BRAF(V600E) cell proliferation, while the MEK inhibitor, PD0325901, inhibited BRAF(V600E), wild-type RAF/RAS, and mutant RAS cancer cell proliferation, similar to the original study (Figure 1A; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). We found knockdown of CRAF, but not BRAF, in mutant RAS cells attenuated the phospho-MEK induction observed after PLX4720 treatment, similar to the original study (Figure 2B; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). The original study reported analogous results with GDC-0879, which was not observed in this replication, although unexpected control results confound the interpretation. We also attempted a replication of an assay with recombinant proteins to test the differential effect of RAF inhibitors on BRAF-CRAF heterodimerization (Figure 4A; Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010). Although we were unable to conduct the experiment as planned, we observed differential binding of BRAF by RAF inhibitors; however, it was between BRAF and beads, independent of CRAF. While these data were unable to address whether, under the conditions of the original study, the same observations could be observed, we discuss key differences between the original study and this replication that are important to consider for further experiments. Finally, where possible, we report meta-analyses for each result. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=62 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (7K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f77d0eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1333494org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c10824org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fda30f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO Cellular dose response curves for RAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E), mutant RAS, and wild-type RAF/RAS cell lines Cell viability assays were performed for RAF inhibitors (PLX4720 and GDC-0879) and MEK inhibitor (PD0325901) against A375, (BRAF(V600E)), HCT116 (mutant RAS), and MeWo (wild-type RAF/RAS) cells. Absolute half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) values ({micro}M) were determined for each biological repeat. EC50 values unable to be accurately estimated are reported as either >20 {micro}M or <0.078 {micro}M, which are the largest and smallest doses tested, respectively. Absolute EC50 values for each biological repeat for A375, HCT116, and MeWo cells treated with (A) PLX4720, (B) GDC-0879, or (C) PD0325901 for this replication attempt are plotted with the EC50 value reported in Hatzivassiliou et al. (2010) displayed as a single point (red triangle) for comparison. Where possible the mean and 95% confidence interval of the replication data are shown. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/52zp9/. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=198 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dc3058org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e9f5d9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@baf5eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@126717a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2.C_FLOATNO Cellular dose response curves for each biological repeat This is the same experiment as in Figure 1. The dose response curve of each biological repeat [n=4] for A375, HCT116, and MeWo cells treated with (A) PLX4720, (B) GDC-0879, or (C) PD0325901 for this replication attempt are plotted. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/52zp9/. C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/470372v2_fig4.gif" ALT="Figure 4"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e4357eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@73e9ceorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fb01c6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@31a799_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 4.C_FLOATNO Testing of BRAF and CRAF antibodies used in original study The BRAF and CRAF antibodies reported in the original study (Hatzivassiliou et al., 2010) were tested for suitability by Western blot. (A) Representative Western blots and Ponceau-stained membrane (experiment performed independently 3 times) of 0.5 {micro}g of purified recombinant BRAF kinase domain (KD). Membranes were probed with the BRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_1840330) or with a different BRAF antibody used in this replication attempt (RRID:AB_2721113). (B) Representative Western blots and Ponceau-stained membrane (experiment performed independently 3 times) of 0.5 {micro}g of purified recombinant GST tagged CRAF KD. Membranes were probed with the CRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_397552) or with a different CRAF antibody used in this replication attempt (RRID:AB_10989977). (C) Representative Western blots (experiment performed once) of 16 {micro}g of whole cell lysates from the indicated human cell lines. Membranes were probed with the BRAF (RRID:AB_1840330) or CRAF (RRID:AB_397552) antibodies used in the original study. (D) Screenshot from the Constraint-based Multiple Alignment Tool (COBALT) (Papadopoulos and Agarwala, 2007) showing the alignment of full-length BRAF (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_004324.2), the region of BRAF used as the immunogenic peptide used to generate the BRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_1840330), the BRAF KD used in this replication attempt, and the BRAF KD used in the original study. (E) Screenshot from COBALT showing the alignment of full-length CRAF (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_002871.1), the region of CRAF used as the immunogenic peptide used to generate the CRAF antibody used in the original study (RRID:AB_397552), and the CRAF KD used in the original study and this replication attempt. Additional details for this experiment can be found at https://osf.io/6f3sk/. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
3
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
8
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
18
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
22
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
24
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
26
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
30
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%