Impacts of vaccination and asymptomatic testing on SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in a university setting
Nixon, E. J.; Thomas, A. C.; Stocks, D. A.; Barreaux, A. M. G.; Hemani, G.; Trickey, A.; Kwiatkowska, R.; Walker, J. G.; Ellis, D.; Danon, L.; Relton, C.; Christensen, H.; Brooks Pollock, E.
Show abstract
We investigate the impact of vaccination and asymptomatic testing uptake on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a university student population using a stochastic compartmental model. We find that the magnitude and timing of outbreaks is highly variable depending on the transmissibility of the most dominant strain of SARS CoV-2 and under different vaccine uptake levels and efficacies. When delta is the dominant strain, low level interventions (no asymptomatic testing, 30% vaccinated with a vaccine that is 80% effective at reducing infection) lead to 53-71% of students become infected during the first term. Asymptomatic testing is most useful when vaccine uptake is low: when 30% of students are vaccinated, 90% uptake of asymptomatic testing leads to almost half the case numbers. With high interventions (90% using asymptomatic testing, 90% vaccinated) cumulative incidence is 7-9%, with around 80% of these cases estimated to be asymptomatic. However, under emergence of a new variant that is at least twice as transmissible as delta and with the vaccine efficacy against infection reduced to 55%, large outbreaks are likely in universities, even with very high (90%) uptake of vaccination and 100% uptake of asymptomatic testing. If vaccine efficacy against infection against this new variant is higher (70%), then outbreaks can be mitigated if there is least 50% uptake of asymptomatic testing additional to 90% uptake of vaccination. Our findings suggest that effective vaccination is critical for controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission in university settings with asymptomatic testing ranging from additionally useful to critical, depending on effectiveness and uptake of vaccination. Other measures may be necessary to control outbreaks under the emergence of a more transmissible variant with vaccine escape.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Harnessing testing strategies and public health measures to avert COVID-19 outbreaks during ocean cruises 95%
- Evidence-based pandemic preparedness: an infrastructure for population-scale genome-based based testing for COVID-19 93%
- Modelling the potential impact of mask use in schools and society on COVID-19 control in the UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 dynamics in Switzerland 95%
- Limited impact of contact tracing in a University setting for COVID-19 due to asymptomatic transmission and social distancing 93%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of hybrid immunity on future COVID-19 epidemic waves 92%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 92%
- Retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 omicron invasion over delta in French regions in 2021-22: a status-based multi-variant model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying within-school SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the impact of lateral flow testing in secondary schools in England 94%
- Can we safely reopen schools during COVID-19 epidemic? 94%
- Assessing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 prevention measures in Austrian schools by means of agent-based simulations calibrated to cluster tracing data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- School and community reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mathematical modeling study 94%
- Optimal health and economic impact of non-pharmaceutical intervention measures prior and post vaccination in England: a mathematical modelling study 93%
- Unifying human infectious disease models and real-time awareness of population- and subpopulation-level intervention effectiveness 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.