C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase as prognostic indicators in COVID-2019 outpatients
Suzuki, K.; Ichikawa, T.; Suzuki, S.; Tanino, Y.; Kakinoki, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundIt is critical for clinicians seeing outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to identify those who will require oxygen therapy after the hospital visit. Although studies on biomarkers predicting mortality or ventilator requirement in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have been conducted, research on biomarkers predicting the need for oxygen therapy in outpatients is sparse. MethodsPatients with COVID-19 who visited Asahikawa City Hospital on an outpatient basis were included in the study. In total, 287 new outpatients visited between April 2021 and September 2021, and 142 underwent blood testing. All blood tests were performed before any treatments for COVID-19 were started. Demographic information, laboratory data, and clinical treatment information were extracted from the electronic medical records. Risk factors associated with oxygen therapy were explored. ResultsIn total, 40 of 142 patients who underwent blood testing required oxygen therapy within 7 days after blood samples were taken, and all other patients recovered without oxygen therapy. C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly higher in patients who required oxygen therapy, and their cutoffs were 36 mg/L (sensitivity, 0.802; specificity, 0.725) and 267 U/L (sensitivity, 0.713; specificity, 0.750), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression identified age, body mass index, CRP [≥] 36 mg/L, and LDH [≥] 267 U/L as significant risk factors for oxygen therapy requirement. This study suggests that elevated CRP and LDH levels are independent risk factors for oxygen therapy in outpatients with COVID-19. Further confirmatory studies are needed.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of the Gamma variant on COVID-19 Patient admissions in a Southern Brazilian tertiary hospital - A comparison of dual pandemic phases 96%
- Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a physiology-based approach 95%
- Assessment of oxidative stress markers in elderly patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential prognostic implications. An observational study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 95%
- Predictive validity of the simplified Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema score for the mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients with the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant in Vietnam: a single-centre, cross-sectional study 95%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relative expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in COVID-19 patients manifested disease severities 95%
- Evaluation of rapid antibody test and chest computed tomography results of COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study 94%
- Early Clinical Factors Predicting the Development of Critical Disease in Japanese Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective, Observational Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 96%
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 94%
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.